Oppo Reno13 F vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and a vibrant display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the better choice. Its 120W charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes, significantly outweighs the Reno13 F’s 45W charging. However, the Oppo Reno13 F’s exceptional 60:45h battery endurance and 1600 charge cycles make it ideal for users who value longevity and minimize charging frequency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 F | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1, 2, 3 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1, 2 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 04 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 11 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, QC, PPS, 44% in 30 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | CPH2699 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | € 465.16 / $ 399.00 / £ 316.00 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60:45h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (240 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13 F
- Exceptional battery endurance (60:45h)
- Long-lasting battery health (1600 charge cycles)
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Display brightness likely lower than competitor
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (100% in 19 min)
- Brighter display (1283 nits)
- More powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Shorter battery endurance (10:38h)
- Potentially faster battery degradation due to faster charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits, compared to the Reno13 F’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Reno13 F’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, detailed sensor information for the Reno13 F is unavailable. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s camera capabilities are expected to be a strong point, potentially featuring a high-resolution main sensor (though not specified in the provided data). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s image processing, powered by the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s ISP, will likely offer more advanced features and better low-light performance. Without specific details on the Reno13 F’s camera hardware, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison beyond assuming the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a more sophisticated camera system.
Performance
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, featuring a Cortex-A715 prime core clocked at 2.8 GHz, while the Reno13 F utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 with Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 4nm process, contributing to improved efficiency, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s GPU is expected to deliver superior graphics performance. The Reno13 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 prioritizes efficiency, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ aims for a balance of power and efficiency.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 F shines in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 60:45h score, and is rated for 1600 charge cycles, indicating exceptional long-term battery health. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a respectable 10:38h active use score, but the key differentiator is its 120W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. While the Reno13 F’s 45W charging is still respectable (44% in 30 minutes), it pales in comparison to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s speed. The Reno13 F prioritizes longevity, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ prioritizes convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 F if you need a phone that will reliably last through a full day of heavy use and maintain battery health over years of ownership. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset is efficient, and the focus on endurance is a clear advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a brighter, more visually engaging display and demand the fastest possible charging speeds. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra offers a performance boost, and the 120W charging is a game-changer for those constantly on the go.