Oppo Reno13 F vs Realme 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and 67W charging offer a noticeable advantage, despite the Reno13 F’s impressive battery endurance. However, the Reno13 F remains a viable option for those prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 F | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1, 2, 3 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1, 2 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 04 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 11 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, QC, PPS, 44% in 30 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | CPH2699 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | € 465.16 / $ 399.00 / £ 316.00 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60:45h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (240 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13 F
- Exceptional battery life (60:45h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1600 charge cycles)
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Potentially less powerful CPU compared to the Pro+
- Limited display brightness information
Realme 12 Pro+
- Faster charging (67W, 50% in 19 min)
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Brighter display (802 nits)
- Shorter battery life (13:24h active use)
- Potentially less battery lifespan than Reno13 F
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Reno13 F’s display specifications are not provided, the Pro+’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both devices utilize a 4nm chipset, suggesting similar power efficiency in display operation, but the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a clear win for outdoor usability. The absence of refresh rate data for the Reno13 F makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pro+ likely offers a smoother visual experience if it includes a high refresh rate panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo Reno13 F, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is likely to offer a more versatile camera system. The focus should be on the main sensor and its aperture. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, and Realme’s typically leans towards vibrant, social media-ready images. The absence of information regarding OIS on the Reno13 F suggests the Pro+ may have an advantage in low-light photography and video stabilization.
Performance
The Realme 12 Pro+ is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), featuring a 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 core cluster. This is a step up from the Oppo Reno13 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) with its 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. The higher clock speeds on the Pro+’s CPU, combined with a slightly more advanced architecture, will result in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 4nm process for efficiency, the 7s Gen 2 offers a performance edge, particularly in graphically demanding tasks. The Reno13 F will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Pro+ is better suited for gaming and resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 F shines in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 60:45h score. This suggests exceptional power efficiency. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ compensates with significantly faster charging – 67W wired, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. The Reno13 F’s 45W charging, while still respectable, takes longer. The Pro+’s active use score of 13:24h indicates a solid, but shorter, runtime. The trade-off is clear: the Reno13 F prioritizes longevity, while the Pro+ prioritizes quick top-ups. The Reno13 F also boasts 1600 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 F if you need exceptional battery life and prioritize maximizing time between charges. Its 60:45h endurance is ideal for heavy users who dislike frequent top-ups. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prefer a snappier user experience, faster charging speeds, and a brighter display, even if it means slightly less overall battery runtime. It’s geared towards users who value responsiveness and quick power boosts.