OnePlus Nord 4 vs Oppo Reno13 F: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 4 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset delivers a substantial performance uplift over the Reno13 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, coupled with significantly faster 100W charging. While the Reno13 F boasts impressive battery endurance, the Nord 4’s speed and convenience outweigh this advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 F | OnePlus Nord 4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1, 2, 3 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1, 2 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 04 | 2024, July 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 11 | Available. Released 2024, August 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 75 x 8 mm (6.40 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 199.5 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2150 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 732 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, QC, PPS, 44% in 30 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PPS, 100% in 28 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue | Obsidian Midnight, Mercurial Silver, Oasis Green |
| Models | CPH2699 | CPH2663, CPH2661 |
| Price | € 465.16 / $ 399.00 / £ 316.00 | € 410.27 / £ 423.17 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60:45h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (240 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13 F
- Exceptional battery endurance (60:45h)
- Long-term battery health with 1600 charge cycles
- Competitive price point (likely)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Slower 45W charging compared to Nord 4
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
OnePlus Nord 4
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset
- Ultra-fast 100W charging (0-100% in 28 minutes)
- Brighter display (1163 nits)
- Potentially shorter battery endurance than Reno13 F
- May be more expensive than Reno13 F
- Faster charging may contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over time
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1163 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While the Reno13 F’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this level of brightness. The Nord 4’s higher brightness also suggests a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience overall. We can assume both displays utilize OLED technology given the market segment, but the Nord 4’s brightness is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Nord 4 will have a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Reno13 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is a capable chipset, but the 7+ Gen 3 in the Nord 4 offers a more advanced imaging pipeline. We can expect the Nord 4 to handle more complex computational photography tasks with greater ease.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 4’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, featuring a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Oppo Reno13 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. The Cortex-X4 architecture in the Nord 4 provides significantly improved single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth UI navigation. The Nord 4’s CPU configuration (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) is architecturally superior to the Reno13 F’s (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to a more capable gaming experience and better performance in demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 F claims an impressive 60:45h battery endurance, suggesting excellent efficiency. However, the OnePlus Nord 4 compensates for potentially lower endurance with its blazing-fast 100W charging, capable of a full charge in just 28 minutes. The Reno13 F’s 45W charging, while still respectable, takes considerably longer. The Nord 4’s charging speed is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Reno13 F’s 1600 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, but the Nord 4’s convenience is a strong counterpoint.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 F if you prioritize maximizing battery life above all else and operate on a tighter budget. Its 60:45h endurance is ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets. Buy the OnePlus Nord 4 if you demand a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 100W charging.