Oppo Reno13 F vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of battery life and fast charging, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion emerges as the winner. Its significantly faster 68W charging and brighter display outweigh the Reno13 F’s longer battery endurance, especially considering the performance gap isn't substantial for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 F | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1, 2, 3 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1, 2 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 04 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 11 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, QC, PPS, 44% in 30 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | CPH2699 | XT2429-1 |
| Price | € 465.16 / $ 399.00 / £ 316.00 | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60:45h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (240 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo Reno13 F
- Exceptional battery endurance (60:45h)
- Long battery lifespan (1600 charge cycles)
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Likely less vibrant display compared to Edge 50 Fusion
- Potentially weaker ISP for image processing
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Significantly faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min)
- Brighter display (1322 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International variant)
- Shorter battery endurance (12:40h active use)
- LATAM variant uses Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, diminishing performance advantage
- Potentially lower battery lifespan compared to Reno13 F
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a considerable advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1322 nits. This is a significant leap over what we’d expect from the Reno13 F, making the Edge 50 Fusion far more usable in direct sunlight. While the Reno13 F’s display specs are not provided, the Edge 50 Fusion’s brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience, particularly for media consumption. The Reno13 F likely relies on a standard AMOLED panel, while the Edge 50 Fusion’s brightness indicates a potentially higher-quality panel with better outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent for both devices, making a direct comparison challenging. However, focusing on the chipsets, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Edge 50 Fusion generally offers superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities compared to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Reno13 F. This translates to potentially better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Without knowing sensor sizes or lens apertures, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Edge 50 Fusion’s chipset gives it a likely advantage.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (International variant) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offering a performance edge over the Oppo Reno13 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. The Edge 50 Fusion’s CPU configuration of 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores provides a noticeable boost in processing power compared to the Reno13 F’s 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. However, the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion downgrades to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, effectively leveling the playing field with the Reno13 F. Both chipsets are 4nm, meaning thermal efficiency is comparable, but the 7s Gen 2 offers a more capable GPU for gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 F claims an impressive 60:45h endurance, suggesting exceptional battery life. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion compensates for its shorter 12:40h active use score with significantly faster charging. The Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W wired charging can deliver 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Reno13 F’s 45W charging takes 30 minutes to reach 44%. The Reno13 F also boasts 1600 charge cycles, indicating a longer lifespan for the battery itself. The Edge 50 Fusion prioritizes speed, while the Reno13 F emphasizes longevity and overall runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 F if you absolutely prioritize maximizing battery life and need a phone that will reliably last through a full day and beyond, even with moderate to heavy use. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, significantly faster charging speeds, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.