Oppo Reno13 F vs. Google Pixel 8a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and fast charging, the Oppo Reno13 F is the stronger choice. However, the Google Pixel 8a’s superior processing power, advanced camera features, and software support make it ideal for those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem and valuing AI-powered features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 F | Google Pixel 8a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1, 2, 3 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - G6GPR (International) |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1, 2 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G6GPR (International) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 04 | 2024, May 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 11 | Available. Released 2024, May 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~430 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 120Hz, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP (16 MP eff.), f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, QC, PPS, 44% in 30 min Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 4492 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Aloe |
| Models | CPH2699 | GKV4X, G6GPR, G8HHN, G576D |
| Price | € 465.16 / $ 399.00 / £ 316.00 | $ 229.98 / C$ 417.99 / £ 279.00 / € 299.99 / ₹ 33,300 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60:45h endurance, 1600 cycles | 40:06h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class B | Class B |
| Free fall | Class B (240 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class B |
Oppo Reno13 F
- Exceptional battery life (60:45h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 45W charging
- Longer battery lifespan (1600 cycles)
- Less powerful processor than Pixel 8a
- Display likely less bright and vibrant
Google Pixel 8a
- Powerful Google Tensor G3 chip
- Brighter, higher-quality display (1508 nits)
- Superior camera processing and AI features
- Shorter battery life (40:06h endurance)
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 8a immediately stands out with its significantly brighter display, peaking at 1508 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno13 F’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Pixel 8a’s panel technology is also likely to be superior, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The Pixel 8a also supports bypass charging, allowing it to charge directly to the battery, potentially extending battery lifespan.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs are missing for the Reno13 F, the Pixel 8a’s strength lies in Google’s computational photography prowess. The Tensor G3’s image signal processor (ISP) excels at noise reduction, dynamic range optimization, and detail enhancement. The Pixel 8a’s camera system benefits from Google’s AI algorithms, delivering consistently excellent results in various lighting conditions. Without knowing the Reno13 F’s sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to directly compare, but the Pixel 8a’s software advantage is a significant differentiator.
Performance
The Google Pixel 8a’s Tensor G3, a nona-core processor with a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Oppo Reno13 F’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. The Tensor G3’s architecture, including the Cortex-A715 and A510 cores, is designed for efficient AI processing and demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while a capable 4nm chip, is geared towards efficient power consumption rather than raw speed. This translates to a smoother experience with demanding apps and games on the Pixel 8a. The Reno13 F’s octa-core CPU (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) will handle everyday tasks well, but will likely struggle with sustained heavy workloads.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno13 F boasts a remarkable 60:45h battery endurance rating, significantly exceeding the Pixel 8a’s 40:06h. This translates to a substantial real-world advantage, allowing the Reno13 F to last considerably longer on a single charge. The Reno13 F also supports 45W wired charging, achieving 44% charge in just 30 minutes, while the Pixel 8a is limited to 18W wired charging. The Reno13 F’s 1600 charge cycles suggest a longer overall battery lifespan compared to the Pixel 8a’s 1000 cycles.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 F if you need a phone that consistently lasts through a full day of heavy use and can be quickly topped up with its 45W charging. It’s perfect for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes battery anxiety. Buy the Google Pixel 8a if you prefer a smoother, more responsive user experience, exceptional camera capabilities, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.