The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno13 F 4G and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take drastically different approaches to achieving it – the Reno13 F focuses on a streamlined experience, while the Poco X6 Pro prioritizes raw performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Reno13 F offers respectable performance for everyday tasks, the X6 Pro’s superior processing power and faster charging justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 04 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 10 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, 45% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Skyline Blue, Plume Purple | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | CPH2701 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- 45W fast charging with reverse wired charging
- Likely more compact and lightweight design
- Significantly weaker processor (Helio G100)
- Limited display brightness information
- Potentially less capable camera system
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Very bright 1148 nit display
- 67W fast charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be bloated with pre-installed apps
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May require more frequent software updates to optimize performance
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, compared to an unstated brightness for the Reno13 F. This makes the X6 Pro far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels (given the price points), the X6 Pro’s higher brightness is a clear advantage. The Reno13 F’s display specifications are currently limited, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate impossible, but the X6 Pro’s brightness alone sets a high bar.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information on the Reno13 F’s camera setup. However, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to feature a more capable primary sensor, likely with a larger sensor size and wider aperture, enabling better low-light performance. While both phones may include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s image signal processor (ISP) in the X6 Pro will likely offer superior image processing capabilities, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos and videos. We anticipate the Reno13 F will rely heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is in a different league than the Reno13 F’s Mediatek Helio G100 (6nm). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides a significant advantage in multi-core performance and efficiency compared to the Reno13 F’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the Poco X6 Pro. The 4nm node also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a strong real-world battery performance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Reno13 F’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support offers a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Reno13 F’s 45W charging, while respectable, is slower. The X6 Pro’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a more convenient and reliable battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 F 4G if you prioritize a balanced, efficient experience and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light multimedia consumption. You'll appreciate its 45W charging and potentially more refined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand high performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value faster charging speeds and a brighter display. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra offers a substantial leap in processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro's Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency than the Reno13 F's 6nm Helio G100. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the X6 Pro is expected to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing performance throttling. Xiaomi also likely incorporates cooling solutions to further mitigate heat buildup.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Oppo Reno13 F sufficient for daily use, or is the Poco X6 Pro's 67W charging a necessity?
45W charging is adequate for most users, but the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W charging significantly reduces charging time. The X6 Pro can reach 100% in 45 minutes, while the Reno13 F takes longer. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery, the X6 Pro’s faster charging is a valuable advantage.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Oppo's ColorOS and Xiaomi's MIUI on these devices?
Oppo's ColorOS is generally considered to be a cleaner and more refined software experience compared to Xiaomi's MIUI. MIUI often includes a significant amount of pre-installed bloatware and can be more aggressive with its app management. However, Xiaomi has been working to improve MIUI in recent iterations, and both offer extensive customization options.
