Oppo Reno13 F 4G vs Realme 12 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and impressive 13:24h active use battery score outweigh the Reno13 F’s faster 45W charging, making it the better all-rounder.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno13 F 4G | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 04 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 10 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75.1 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, 45% in 30 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Grey, Skyline Blue, Plume Purple | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | CPH2701 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | - | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- Faster initial charging speed (45W)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Helio G100 chipset for basic tasks
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Likely shorter battery life
- Display brightness likely lower than Realme 12 Pro+
Realme 12 Pro+
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Excellent battery life (13:24h active use)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slightly slower initial charging speed (67W)
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 802 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno13 F. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market positioning), the Realme’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Details regarding refresh rates and PWM dimming are missing for both, but a higher PWM rate on either would benefit users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-focused device, suggesting a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Reno13 F, while likely capable, is less explicitly marketed for its camera prowess. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance and video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) offers a substantial architectural advantage over the Oppo Reno13 F’s MediaTek Helio G100 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon is inherently more power-efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 – also provides a performance edge over the Reno13 F’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Realme.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 13:24h active use score. While the Oppo Reno13 F’s battery capacity is unknown, the Realme’s score indicates superior efficiency. The Realme also supports 67W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 19 minutes, while the Reno13 F’s 45W charging reaches 45% in 30 minutes. Although the Reno13 F charges faster initially, the Realme’s larger battery and overall efficiency provide a longer-lasting experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno13 F 4G if you prioritize quick charging and a lighter price tag, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks and casual gaming. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you demand smoother multitasking, longer battery life for demanding applications, and a more future-proof chipset for handling evolving software and games.