Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Oppo Reno12: A Deep Dive into Performance, Battery, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Reno12 delivers exceptional battery life and a bright display, making it ideal for those who value efficiency and all-day usability over sheer speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 18 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 25 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/3.1", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD2.0, 47% in 18 min, 100% in 46 min, Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Brown, Sunset Pink, Astro Silver | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | CPH2625 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | € 303.99 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno12
- Exceptional battery life (14:53h active use)
- Brighter display (1378 nits)
- Efficient Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Slower charging compared to the 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Blazing-fast Dimensity 9300+ processor
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially superior image processing capabilities
- Shorter battery life (12:32h active use)
- Lower peak display brightness (1228 nits)
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ noticeably. The Oppo Reno12 boasts a peak brightness of 1378 nits, exceeding the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 1228 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight for the Reno12. While both likely employ AMOLED panels, the Reno12’s higher brightness suggests a potentially more advanced panel configuration. We lack information on refresh rates or PWM dimming, but the Reno12’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the 14T Pro has more processing power available for image processing and computational photography. The Reno12’s Dimensity 7300 Energy is capable, but the 9300+ in the 14T Pro provides a more robust platform for advanced camera features. We can assume the 14T Pro will offer faster image capture and potentially better low-light performance, given its processing advantage. The absence of sensor details makes a definitive statement impossible.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Dimensity 9300+ features a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 core alongside three additional Cortex-X4 cores, and four Cortex-A720 cores, representing a substantial leap over the Oppo Reno12’s Dimensity 7300 Energy, which uses 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 9300+’s architecture is designed for peak performance, making it superior for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Reno12’s chip focuses on efficiency, offering a smooth experience for everyday use but lacking the headroom of the 14T Pro. The 14T Pro will likely exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno12 achieves an impressive 14:53h of active use, outperforming the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 12:32h. This difference is likely attributable to the more efficient Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset and potentially a more optimized software experience. While the 14T Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 120W wired (100% in 19 minutes) and 50W wireless (100% in 45 minutes) – the Reno12’s 80W wired charging (100% in 46 minutes) is still respectable. The 14T Pro’s charging speed is a major convenience factor, but the Reno12’s longer battery life reduces the need to charge as frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 if you need a phone that consistently lasts through a full day of heavy use and offers a vibrant viewing experience. It’s perfect for media consumption, social media, and everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand the fastest possible performance for gaming, demanding applications, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging, even if it means slightly shorter battery life.