Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Oppo Reno12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Powerhouses

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno12 Pro and Xiaomi 14T Pro represent compelling options for users seeking flagship-level features without the flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, battery life, charging speeds, and display quality to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset offers a significant performance leap, and the 120W charging is unmatched. However, the Oppo Reno12 Pro excels in battery endurance, making it ideal for users who prioritize longevity over raw speed.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno12 Pro Xiaomi 14T Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 11, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 11, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, June 182024, September 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, June 18Available. Released 2024, September 26
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X)
Dimensions161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.36 x 2.94 x 0.29 in)160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight180 g (6.35 oz)209 g (7.37 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak)AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)
GPUMali-G615 MC2Immortalis-G720 MC12
OSAndroid 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14.1Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLeica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.75", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanorama, HDRHDR
Single50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", PDAF32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYes, 360˚ (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD2.0, 47% in 18 min, 100% in 46 min, Reverse wired120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsSpace Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish MalhotraTitan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black
ModelsCPH26292407FPN8EG
Price€ 379.99 / £ 329.00$ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99
SAR EU-0.99 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)

Oppo Reno12 Pro

  • Exceptional battery life (14:54h active use)
  • High peak display brightness (1380 nits)
  • Efficient Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset

  • Slower charging speed (46 minutes to 100%)
  • Less powerful chipset compared to the 14T Pro

Xiaomi 14T Pro

  • Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (19 minutes to 100%)
  • Powerful Dimensity 9300+ chipset for demanding tasks
  • 50W wireless charging support

  • Shorter battery life (12:32h active use)
  • Lower peak display brightness (1228 nits)

Display Comparison

Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, allowing for efficient display operation. The Oppo Reno12 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 1380 nits, exceeding the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 1228 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight for the Oppo. While both likely employ AMOLED panels, the Reno12 Pro’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and readable experience outdoors. Details regarding refresh rates and panel technology (LTPO) are missing, but the Reno12 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Xiaomi 14T Pro will have a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Dimensity 9300+’s superior processing capabilities will likely translate to more sophisticated computational photography features. The absence of sensor details makes it difficult to assess image quality definitively, but the 14T Pro’s chipset gives it an edge in image processing.

Performance

The performance gap is significant. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Dimensity 9300+ features a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 core alongside three additional Cortex-X4 cores, and four Cortex-A720 cores, representing a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 Energy. The Reno12 Pro’s CPU configuration of 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores is geared towards efficiency, while the 14T Pro prioritizes raw power. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and resource-intensive applications. The 14T Pro will likely exhibit less throttling under sustained load due to the more advanced chipset architecture.

Battery Life

The Oppo Reno12 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an active use score of 14:54h compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 12:32h. This suggests the Dimensity 7300 Energy’s efficiency, combined with software optimization, delivers superior stamina. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro compensates with its incredibly fast 120W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 19 minutes, while the Reno12 Pro takes 46 minutes with its 80W charging. The 14T Pro also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno12 Pro. The Reno12 Pro prioritizes longevity, while the 14T Pro prioritizes speed and convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro if you need all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks. Its efficient Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset and optimized software deliver excellent stamina. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging. The Dimensity 9300+ provides a substantial performance boost, and the 120W charging gets you back to 100% in under 20 minutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Dimensity 9300+ chipset generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chipset, the 4nm process node and likely thermal management solutions within the Xiaomi 14T Pro should mitigate significant overheating. However, expect some heat generation during extended, graphically intensive gaming. The phone's thermal throttling behavior will determine sustained performance levels.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Oppo Reno12 Pro compare to the 120W charging on the Xiaomi 14T Pro in real-world usage?
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W charging is significantly faster, fully charging the device in 19 minutes compared to the Reno12 Pro’s 46 minutes. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While 80W is still fast, the 14T Pro offers a level of convenience the Reno12 Pro cannot match.
❓ Is the difference in active use battery life between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 2 hour and 22 minute difference in active use scores (14:54h vs 12:32h) is likely to be noticeable for average users. The Oppo Reno12 Pro will require less frequent charging, making it a better choice for those who prioritize battery longevity.