Oppo Reno12 Pro vs. Realme GT6 (China): A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a smooth, efficient experience, the Oppo Reno12 Pro emerges as the winner. However, the Realme GT6 (China) is the clear choice for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance and are willing to trade some battery longevity for it.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 Pro | Realme GT6 (China) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 18 | 2024, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 18 | Available. Released 2024, July 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.36 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 162 x 76.1 x 8.4 mm (6.38 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Crystal Armor glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.75", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", PDAF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS (G1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD2.0, 47% in 18 min, 100% in 46 min, Reverse wired | 120W wired, 50% in 12 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish Malhotra | Moon, White, Purple |
| Models | CPH2629 | - |
| Price | € 379.99 / £ 329.00 | - |
Oppo Reno12 Pro
- Excellent battery life (14:54h active use)
- Efficient Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset
- 80W fast charging with reverse wired support
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Lower peak display brightness
Realme GT6 (China)
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- 120W ultra-fast charging (50% in 12 min)
- Brighter display (1483 nits)
- Potentially shorter battery life due to power-hungry chipset
- May require more active battery management
Display Comparison
Both phones feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ significantly. The Realme GT6 boasts a brighter panel at 1483 nits measured, compared to the Reno12 Pro’s 1380 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight for the GT6. While both likely employ AMOLED technology (not specified), the GT6’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. We expect both to have excellent color accuracy, but the GT6’s brightness gives it an edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera processing. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance on the GT6. We can assume both phones will offer capable camera systems, but the GT6 likely has an advantage in computational photography and video recording due to its superior processing power. The Reno12 Pro will likely focus on a balanced, natural image style, while the GT6 might lean towards more vibrant, processed images.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Realme GT6’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, is in a different league than the Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 Energy. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architecture (1x Cortex-X4, 3x Cortex-A720, 2x Cortex-A720, 2x Cortex-A520) is designed for sustained peak performance, crucial for demanding games and applications. The Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 Energy (4x Cortex-A78, 4x Cortex-A55) prioritizes efficiency, offering a smooth experience for everyday tasks but lacking the raw power of the Snapdragon. The GT6 will exhibit significantly faster app loading times and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Realme GT6’s 120W charging is a game-changer, reaching 50% charge in just 12 minutes. The Reno12 Pro’s 80W charging is respectable, taking 46 minutes for a full charge, but significantly slower. The Reno12 Pro’s active use battery score of 14:54h suggests excellent efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity (not specified). The GT6’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is more power-hungry, meaning it will likely require more frequent charging despite its faster charging speed. Users prioritizing longevity will lean towards the Reno12 Pro, while those needing quick top-ups will appreciate the GT6.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro if you need a phone that comfortably lasts a full day with moderate to heavy use, prioritizes a refined software experience, and offers excellent value for its price. Buy the Realme GT6 (China) if you prefer uncompromising gaming performance, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to manage battery life more actively to unlock the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s full potential.