Oppo Reno12 Pro vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value

The Oppo Reno12 Pro and Google Pixel 8 Pro represent distinct approaches to the premium smartphone market. The Reno12 Pro focuses on delivering a well-rounded experience with rapid charging and a competitive price, while the Pixel 8 Pro aims for flagship status with Google’s Tensor G3 chip and renowned camera capabilities. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing battery life and fast charging, the Oppo Reno12 Pro emerges as the winner. Its impressive 14:54h active use score and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h and 30W charging, making it ideal for power users. However, the Pixel 8 Pro’s superior display and camera system cater to a different audience.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno12 Pro Google Pixel 8 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 11, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 11, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, June 182023, October 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, June 18Available. Released 2023, October 12
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
Dimensions161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.36 x 2.94 x 0.29 in)162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight180 g (6.35 oz)213 g (7.51 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak)LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G615 MC2Immortalis-G715s MC10
OSAndroid 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14.1Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaMulti-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.75", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanorama, HDRHDR, panorama
Single50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", PDAF10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFCYes, 360˚ (market/region dependent)Yes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD2.0, 47% in 18 min, 100% in 46 min, Reverse wired30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging
Type5000 mAhLi-Ion 5050 mAh
Misc
ColorsSpace Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish MalhotraObsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint
ModelsCPH2629GC3VE, G1MNW
Price€ 379.99 / £ 329.00€ 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999

Oppo Reno12 Pro

  • Exceptional battery life (14:54h active use)
  • Ultra-fast 80W wired charging
  • Competitive price point

  • Display brightness lower than Pixel 8 Pro
  • Chipset may not match Pixel 8 Pro’s AI capabilities

Google Pixel 8 Pro

  • Brighter and potentially more color-accurate display
  • Powerful Google Tensor G3 chip with AI focus
  • Superior camera system with advanced image processing

  • Shorter battery life (11:14h active use)
  • Slower 30W wired charging
  • Higher price

Display Comparison

The Google Pixel 8 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching 1600 nits compared to the Reno12 Pro’s 1380 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the Pixel 8 Pro’s display technology likely incorporates LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, potentially improving power efficiency and smoothness, a feature not explicitly stated for the Reno12 Pro. The Pixel 8 Pro’s panel is also expected to have superior color accuracy, crucial for content creators and those who demand visual fidelity.

Camera Comparison

The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera system is a key differentiator. While specific sensor details are missing, Google’s computational photography prowess is well-established. The Reno12 Pro’s camera capabilities are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but it’s reasonable to assume the Pixel 8 Pro will excel in dynamic range, low-light performance, and video stabilization. The Pixel 8 Pro’s focus on both photo and video processing suggests a more versatile camera experience, while the Reno12 Pro likely targets a balance between quality and affordability.

Performance

The chipset choice defines the performance profiles. The Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3, with its nona-core configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510), prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks. The Reno12 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) utilizes an octa-core setup (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) geared towards efficient performance. While the Tensor G3 has a higher clock speed on its prime core, the Dimensity 7300 Energy’s architecture may offer a more consistent experience for demanding applications. The Pixel 8 Pro likely benefits from faster LPDDR5x RAM, enhancing multitasking capabilities.

Battery Life

Battery life is where the Reno12 Pro shines. Its 14:54h active use score significantly surpasses the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h. While the Pixel 8 Pro’s older endurance rating of 90h suggests respectable longevity, real-world usage favors the Reno12 Pro. Furthermore, the Reno12 Pro’s 80W wired charging is dramatically faster than the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W charging – 47% charge in 18 minutes versus 50% in 30 minutes. The Reno12 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature the Pixel 8 Pro matches with reverse wireless charging, offering flexibility in powering accessories.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, incredibly fast charging, and a balanced feature set at a more accessible price point. You’ll benefit from all-day usability and minimal downtime. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a top-tier camera experience, a brighter and potentially more color-accurate display, and Google’s exclusive software features, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance and charging speed.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How does the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy handle graphically intensive games compared to the Google Tensor G3?
While the Tensor G3 has a more powerful GPU on paper, the Dimensity 7300 Energy’s efficient architecture and 4nm process can deliver a surprisingly smooth gaming experience. The Reno12 Pro may require slightly lower graphics settings in the most demanding titles, but it’s unlikely to struggle with mainstream games. Thermal management will be key, and the Dimensity 7300 Energy is generally known for its efficiency.
❓ Does the Pixel 8 Pro’s ‘Bypass charging’ feature significantly extend battery lifespan compared to the Reno12 Pro’s charging methods?
The Pixel 8 Pro’s Bypass charging, which reduces battery stress by directly powering the device when plugged in, is a valuable feature for long-term battery health. The Reno12 Pro doesn’t offer a comparable feature. Over time, this could translate to a slower rate of battery degradation on the Pixel 8 Pro, especially for users who frequently leave their phone plugged in overnight.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 80W and 30W truly noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The Reno12 Pro’s 80W charging can add nearly 50% charge in just 18 minutes, while the Pixel 8 Pro takes 30 minutes for the same. This difference is significant for users who frequently need a quick top-up, especially during busy days. The convenience of rapidly replenishing the battery is a major advantage for the Reno12 Pro.