Oppo Reno12 Pro vs. iPhone 15 Pro Max: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, a seamless ecosystem, and top-tier performance, the iPhone 15 Pro Max is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Reno12 Pro offers a compelling alternative with significantly faster wired charging and a bright display at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 Pro | Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66 - A3106 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3106 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 18 | 2023, September 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 18 | Available. Released 2023, September 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back, titanium frame (grade 5) |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.36 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 159.9 x 76.7 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time; International)· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Ceramic Shield glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1290 x 2796 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Hexa-core (2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | Apple A17 Pro (3 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Apple GPU (6-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14.1 | iOS 17, upgradable to iOS 26.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 1TB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.75", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 48 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.8, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3D sensor‑shift OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, 3D (spatial) video, stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.75", PDAF | 12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD2.0, 47% in 18 min, 100% in 46 min, Reverse wired | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.2 update 4.5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4441 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish Malhotra | Black Titanium, White Titanium, Blue Titanium, Natural Titanium |
| Models | CPH2629 | A2849, A3105, A3106, A3108, iPhone16,2 |
| Price | € 379.99 / £ 329.00 | € 758.79 / $ 579.87 / £ 628.29 |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno12 Pro
- 80W SuperVOOC charging is significantly faster.
- Potentially lower price point offers excellent value.
- Android OS provides greater customization options.
- Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset is less powerful than the A17 Pro.
- Battery life is slightly shorter than the iPhone 15 Pro Max.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
- A17 Pro chipset delivers class-leading performance.
- Superior camera system with advanced features.
- Longer battery life and excellent software support.
- Slower wired charging compared to the Oppo Reno12 Pro.
- Higher price point makes it less accessible.
Display Comparison
The iPhone 15 Pro Max boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1787 nits compared to the Reno12 Pro’s 1380 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both support PD2.0, the iPhone’s display likely utilizes a more advanced LTPO panel for variable refresh rates, contributing to better power efficiency. The Reno12 Pro’s brightness is still excellent, but the iPhone offers a noticeable advantage for outdoor use and HDR content viewing.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices, but based on brand reputation, the iPhone 15 Pro Max is expected to offer a more sophisticated camera system. Apple typically prioritizes computational photography and video recording quality, with features like ProRes video and Cinematic mode. The Reno12 Pro likely focuses on delivering strong image quality in various lighting conditions, but may not match the iPhone’s video capabilities or advanced features. The absence of sensor size details makes a direct comparison difficult, but Apple’s larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms generally provide superior results.
Performance
Apple’s A17 Pro, fabricated on a 3nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Reno12 Pro’s 4nm Dimensity 7300 Energy. The A17 Pro’s hexa-core CPU (2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz) architecture, while fewer cores than the Reno12 Pro’s octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), delivers higher single-core and multi-core performance. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing and high-end gaming. The A17 Pro’s GPU also provides a significant advantage in graphics-intensive applications. While the Dimensity 7300 Energy is a capable chip, it’s positioned in a different performance tier.
Battery Life
The iPhone 15 Pro Max edges out the Reno12 Pro in battery life, achieving an active use score of 16:01h versus 14:54h. While the Reno12 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 80W wired (100% in 46 minutes) compared to the iPhone’s wired charging (50% in 30 minutes) – the iPhone’s overall endurance is superior. The iPhone also offers 15W wireless charging (MagSafe/Qi2), while the Reno12 Pro provides reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the iPhone. The Reno12 Pro’s faster charging is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro if you need blazing-fast 80W wired charging, prioritize a vibrant display for media consumption, and prefer the flexibility of Android. Buy the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max if you value the best possible performance, a refined camera system, long-term software support, and seamless integration with other Apple devices.