Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro vs Oppo Reno12 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset provides a clear performance advantage, particularly in sustained workloads and gaming, coupled with significantly faster 120W charging. While the Reno12 Pro offers a respectable experience, it can't match the K70 Pro's raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.6 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Rose Gold | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | PJW110 | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 430 EUR |
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- Potentially more refined software experience (depending on ROM)
- 80W fast charging is still convenient
- Competitive price point (likely)
- Dimensity 9200+ chipset is outperformed by Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Slower charging compared to the K70 Pro
- Camera performance likely trails the K70 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers class-leading performance
- 120W charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Advanced ISP for superior image processing
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for higher price compared to the Reno12 Pro
- Thermal throttling could be a concern under sustained load (though mitigated by the 8 Gen 3)
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing for the Reno12 Pro. The Redmi K70 Pro, given its flagship positioning, is expected to boast a high peak brightness exceeding 1400 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Both utilize a 4nm process, suggesting comparable efficiency. The K70 Pro's display is likely to feature LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life during static content viewing, a feature we anticipate but cannot confirm for the Reno12 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Reno12 Pro, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Redmi K70 Pro is expected to feature a high-resolution primary sensor (likely 50MP or higher) with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is renowned for its advanced image processing capabilities, delivering excellent dynamic range and low-light performance. The Reno12 Pro will likely rely on MediaTek’s ISP, which has improved significantly but generally trails Qualcomm’s offerings. We anticipate both phones will offer capable camera systems, but the K70 Pro has the edge in overall image quality and processing speed.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a generational leap over the Oppo Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 features the newer Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, alongside improved Cortex-A720 performance cores, offering a substantial advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The GPU within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 also provides a significant uplift in graphics performance. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, Qualcomm’s architecture generally exhibits superior thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The K70 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in approximately 18 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo Reno12 Pro’s 80W charging, which, while still respectable, will take considerably longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the K70 Pro mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Both support PD (Power Delivery) standards, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience (depending on your ROM preference) and are comfortable with the limitations of its charging speed. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W wired charging. The K70 Pro is the clear choice for power users.