Oppo Reno12 Pro vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Mediatek Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ and 80W charging, despite the Reno12 Pro offering a potentially more refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.6 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Rose Gold | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | PJW110 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 440 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Balanced feature set
- 80W fast charging is still respectable
- Dimensity 9200+ is outperformed by the 9300+
- Slower charging compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Missing display specifications (peak brightness, refresh rate)
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Dimensity 9300+ offers superior performance
- Industry-leading 120W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display (1228 nits)
- MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for more aggressive image processing
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1228 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the Reno12 Pro. This higher brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the 14T Pro’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO vs standard OLED) are missing for the Reno12 Pro, but the 14T Pro’s brightness alone gives it an edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the focus should be on the main sensor and image processing. The Reno12 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a focus on natural color reproduction, while Xiaomi often leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS on both devices makes it impossible to determine a clear winner. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant, as image quality is typically poor.
Performance
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ represents a generational leap over the Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+. The 9300+ features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4 GHz, compared to the Reno12 Pro’s 3.35 GHz Cortex-X3. More importantly, the 9300+ utilizes all Cortex-X4 cores for performance, while the 9200+ mixes in A715 cores. This architectural difference, combined with the higher clock speeds, will result in noticeably faster CPU performance in demanding applications and benchmarks. Both phones utilize 4nm fabrication, but the 9300+'s newer architecture should offer improved efficiency. The 14T Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM, while not explicitly stated for the Reno12 Pro, is a likely standard, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo Reno12 Pro’s 80W charging. The 14T Pro also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno12 Pro. While the 14T Pro’s active use battery score of 12:32h is a useful metric, the Reno12 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown. However, the 14T Pro’s faster charging mitigates concerns about potentially lower battery capacity, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) if you prioritize a potentially more polished software experience and a balanced feature set. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging, maximum performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software.