Oppo Reno12 Pro vs Realme GT5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly superior processing power and gaming performance, complemented by a brighter display and faster charging. However, the Reno12 Pro offers a compelling alternative for those prioritizing a potentially more efficient chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) | Realme GT5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2023, December 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.6 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 161.7 x 75.1 x 9.2 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 218 g / 224 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 2.7x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos certified) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Rose Gold | Black, Silver, Orange |
| Models | PJW110 | RMX3888 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 430 EUR |
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- Potentially better thermal efficiency with Dimensity 9200+
- 80W wired charging with PD support
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- No wireless charging
Realme GT5 Pro
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor
- 1660 nits peak display brightness
- 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May run warmer under sustained load
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
The Realme GT5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1660 nits, crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Reno12 Pro’s display specs are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this peak brightness. The GT5 Pro’s brightness advantage will be noticeable in direct sunlight. Both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels, but the GT5 Pro’s higher peak brightness and potential for higher refresh rates (based on Realme’s typical implementation) give it an edge. The absence of LTPO information for the Reno12 Pro makes it difficult to assess its power efficiency compared to the GT5 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the Realme GT5 Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, typical of its performance-focused positioning. While both phones likely include multiple lenses, the GT5 Pro’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP, will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Reno12 Pro’s camera will likely focus on balanced image processing, while the GT5 Pro may lean towards more vibrant and detailed results. Without specific sensor size information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the GT5 Pro’s chipset advantage suggests superior image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme GT5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) versus the Oppo Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, offers a substantial performance uplift over the Dimensity 9200+'s Cortex-X3 at 3.35 GHz. The GT5 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.3GHz, 3x3.2GHz, 2x3.0GHz, 2x2.3GHz) is optimized for sustained performance, while the Reno12 Pro’s (1x3.35GHz, 3x3.0GHz, 4x2.0GHz) leans towards efficiency. The GT5 Pro’s Adreno 750 GPU will also provide a superior gaming experience. The GT5 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances its performance capabilities.
Battery Life
The Realme GT5 Pro’s 100W wired charging is significantly faster than the Oppo Reno12 Pro’s 80W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 12 minutes. The GT5 Pro also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno12 Pro. The GT5 Pro’s active use battery score of 14:16h demonstrates excellent real-world endurance. While the Reno12 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the GT5 Pro’s faster charging and comparable battery life make it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) if you prioritize a potentially more thermally efficient chipset for sustained tasks and value a balanced feature set. Buy the Realme GT5 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate the benefits of faster charging and a brighter display. The GT5 Pro is the clear choice for power users.