OnePlus 12R vs Oppo Reno12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a more consistently powerful and thermally efficient experience, coupled with faster 100W charging and a demonstrably longer battery life in active use (14:32h). While the Reno12 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ is capable, the 12R’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.6 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Rose Gold | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | PJW110 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- Superior sustained performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Longer battery life (14:32h active use)
- Faster 100W charging (26 min 0-100%)
- May lack the software refinements of Oppo’s ColorOS (subjective)
- Design may be less visually striking than some competitors
OnePlus 12R
- Potentially optimized software experience for Chinese users
- Dimensity 9200+ offers strong peak performance
- 80W charging is still relatively fast
- Shorter battery life compared to OnePlus 12R
- Importing required for most international users
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a display capable of reaching 1181 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno12 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The 12R’s brightness advantage is significant, and its likely use of LTPO technology (common in this price bracket) would contribute to improved power efficiency. Without detailed color accuracy data for the Reno12 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its color performance relative to the 12R.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Reno12 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely feature capable main sensors. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the 12R is renowned for its excellent image processing capabilities, offering strong dynamic range and detail. The Reno12 Pro’s image processing will likely lean towards Oppo’s signature vibrant color profile. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS on the Reno12 Pro makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the 12R.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a proven performer, featuring a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core. The Oppo Reno12 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm), with a slightly faster 3.35 GHz Cortex-X3. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture, particularly its Adreno 740 GPU, generally delivers superior sustained performance and better thermal management. The 12R’s CPU configuration (1x3.2GHz, 2x2.8GHz A715, 2x2.8GHz A710, 3x2.0GHz A510) is optimized for a balance of power and efficiency, while the Reno12 Pro’s (1x3.35GHz, 3x3.0GHz A715, 4x2.0GHz A510) may show slight single-core advantages but potentially at the cost of sustained multi-core performance due to thermal constraints.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 14 hours and 32 minutes of active use. While the Reno12 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the 12R’s larger battery combined with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s efficiency provides a clear advantage. Furthermore, the 12R’s 100W charging, capable of a full charge in just 26 minutes, significantly outperforms the Reno12 Pro’s 80W charging, reducing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience tailored to the Chinese ecosystem and are comfortable with importing a device. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you value raw performance, longer battery life, faster charging, and a globally supported device with a proven track record of software updates and community support.