Poco X6 Pro vs Oppo Reno12 F: Which Dimensity Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage. While the Reno12 F offers a more streamlined experience, the X6 Pro’s raw power justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 F | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 28 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0 Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Olive Green, Amber Orange | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | CPH2637 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | € 197.00 / $ 390.00 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno12 F
- Potentially more efficient chipset (6nm)
- Sleek and stylish design (assumed based on Oppo's branding)
- PD2.0 charging compatibility
- Significantly weaker chipset performance
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Likely inferior display brightness
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Faster 67W charging with QC2.0/PD3.0
- Brighter display (1148 nits)
- Potentially less efficient chipset (4nm can draw more power)
- Larger size and weight (likely)
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno12 F. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market trends), the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Details regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are missing for both, but a higher refresh rate on the X6 Pro would further enhance the gaming experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo/Video' are absent for both devices. However, given the Poco X6 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a more capable primary sensor. The Reno12 F may focus on software-driven image processing for a more polished look, but the X6 Pro’s hardware advantage should translate to better low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the X6 Pro, a common feature in this price bracket, would further enhance image and video quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Reno12 F’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 8300 Ultra features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A715 cores versus the Reno12 F’s A76 – and a more powerful GPU. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X6 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) is demonstrably faster than the Reno12 F’s (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55).
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates superior real-world battery performance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Reno12 F’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s 67W charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support, capable of a full charge in 45 minutes, significantly outperforms the Reno12 F’s 45W wired charging with PD2.0. This faster charging is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently deplete their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 F if you prioritize a sleek design, efficient power consumption for all-day use, and a more refined software experience. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and value faster charging speeds. It’s the better option for power users and mobile gamers.