Oppo Reno12 F vs Realme 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset, coupled with 67W charging, provides a noticeable edge over the Reno12 F’s Dimensity 6300 and 45W charging, despite the Reno12 F's potentially more efficient processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 F | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 28 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0 Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Olive Green, Amber Orange | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | CPH2637 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | € 197.00 / $ 390.00 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
Oppo Reno12 F
- Potentially better power efficiency due to 6nm process
- Sleek design (assumed based on Oppo's design language)
- PD2.0 charging support for wider compatibility
- Slower charging speed (45W vs 67W)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 6300 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 2)
Realme 12 Pro+
- Faster 67W charging with quick 50% charge time
- Stronger performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Excellent battery life (13:24h active use)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- May be slightly less power efficient than the Reno12 F
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 802 nits. While the Reno12 F’s display specifications are not provided, this brightness difference is significant for outdoor visibility. The Realme’s panel likely benefits from its higher peak brightness, offering a more vibrant and readable experience in direct sunlight. Without knowing the Reno12 F’s panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) or refresh rate, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy and viewing angles, but the Realme 12 Pro+ has a clear advantage in peak luminance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for both devices, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-focused device, and typically Realme prioritizes main sensor quality. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures on the Reno12 F suggests it may not compete directly with the Realme 12 Pro+ in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume the Realme 12 Pro+ will offer more advanced image processing capabilities and potentially better dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz. This architecture is a step up from the Oppo Reno12 F’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), which employs two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load, reducing thermal throttling. While both CPUs have similar peak clock speeds, the A78 cores in the Snapdragon are more efficient and powerful than the A76 cores in the Dimensity 6300. This will be most noticeable in graphically intensive games and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ demonstrates a clear advantage in charging speed with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. The Oppo Reno12 F’s 45W charging, while respectable, is significantly slower. More importantly, the Realme 12 Pro+ achieves an impressive 13:24h active use battery score, indicating excellent real-world endurance. While the Reno12 F’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging and longer battery life of the Realme 12 Pro+ make it the more convenient option for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 F if you prioritize power efficiency and a potentially smoother everyday experience with less demanding tasks. Its Dimensity 6300, built on a 6nm process, may offer better thermal management during prolonged, lighter use. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster 67W charging, backed by a proven 13:24h active use battery life.