Oppo Reno12 F vs Honor X9b: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficient power usage, the Honor X9b emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, built on a 4nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in thermal management and overall responsiveness compared to the Reno12 F's Dimensity 6300. However, the Reno12 F's 45W charging offers a quicker top-up.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 F | Honor X9b |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 28 | 2023, October 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0 Reverse wired | 35W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Olive Green, Amber Orange | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green |
| Models | CPH2637 | ALI-NX1 |
| Price | € 197.00 / $ 390.00 | About 970 EUR |
Oppo Reno12 F
- Faster 45W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Potentially more vibrant image processing with ColorOS.
- Reverse wired charging for accessory power.
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset.
- Potential for more thermal throttling under heavy load.
- CPU architecture is a generation behind the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1.
Honor X9b
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset.
- Superior thermal management for sustained performance.
- Newer Cortex-A78 CPU cores for improved responsiveness.
- Slower 35W charging compared to the Oppo Reno12 F.
- Image processing may lean towards a more natural, less vibrant look.
- May require more time to fully charge.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (OLED vs LCD, peak brightness) are missing, the focus here is on the chipsets. Display quality will likely be similar, with both targeting a smooth 120Hz refresh rate common in this segment. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the real differentiator will be software-level color calibration and viewing angles, which are difficult to assess without direct comparison.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely employ similar sensor configurations targeting the mid-range market. The absence of high-resolution sensors or advanced features like OIS suggests a focus on computational photography. Image processing styles will likely differ – Oppo’s ColorOS tends towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor often aims for a more natural look. The real-world performance will depend heavily on software optimization and the quality of the primary sensor, which is currently unknown for both devices.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X9b’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) offers a significant architectural advantage over the Oppo Reno12 F’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 4nm process inherently leads to better power efficiency and reduced heat generation. While the Dimensity 6300 features Cortex-A76 cores, the X9b’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, which are a generation newer and offer improved performance per watt. This translates to less throttling under sustained loads, benefiting gamers and heavy multitaskers. The X9b's CPU configuration (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) also provides a slight edge in peak performance compared to the Reno12 F's (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55).
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno12 F’s 45W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Honor X9b’s 35W charging. This means significantly faster 0-100% charging times for the Reno12 F. While battery capacity is not specified, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s superior efficiency in the X9b could offset a potentially smaller battery size, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. Both devices support reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 F if you prioritize faster charging speeds and a potentially more refined software experience (depending on ColorOS preference). It's ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value quick power boosts. Buy the Honor X9b if you prioritize consistent performance during extended use, such as gaming or multitasking, and appreciate the efficiency of the 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. This phone is better suited for users who demand reliable performance throughout the day.