Google Pixel 7a vs Oppo Reno12 F: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset provides a more powerful and efficient experience, and its camera system is in a different league. However, the Oppo Reno12 F’s 45W charging is a significant advantage for those prioritizing speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 F | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 28 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0 Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Olive Green, Amber Orange | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | CPH2637 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | € 197.00 / $ 390.00 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Oppo Reno12 F
- Superior performance with the Google Tensor G2
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Long-term software support from Google
- Bright and vibrant display
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Potentially lower battery endurance than Reno12 F
Google Pixel 7a
- Incredibly fast 45W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially lighter and more compact design
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 6300)
- Inferior camera performance compared to Pixel 7a
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno12 F’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel, combined with its brightness, delivers a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The Pixel 7a's 90Hz refresh rate (assumed based on Pixel A-series history) also contributes to smoother scrolling compared to the likely 60Hz panel on the Reno12 F.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image processing. The Reno12 F’s camera capabilities are less defined, and it likely relies more on hardware than software for image enhancement. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s video processing capabilities. We can assume the Pixel 7a has OIS, while the Reno12 F's OIS status is unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance than the Reno12 F’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Dimensity 6300, while capable, relies on older Cortex-A76 cores, resulting in lower single-core and multi-core scores. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive experience on the Pixel 7a, particularly for AI-driven tasks. The Tensor G2’s integrated machine learning capabilities also enhance features like voice recognition and image processing. The Pixel 7a likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further boosting performance.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Reno12 F’s 45W wired charging with PD2.0 is a game-changer. This allows for significantly faster charging times compared to the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging with PD3.0. While the Pixel 7a may offer slightly longer overall battery life, the Reno12 F’s ability to quickly top up is a major convenience factor. The Reno12 F also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 F if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and a lighter, more streamlined Android experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t heavily rely on demanding apps or mobile gaming. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a superior camera, smoother performance, and Google’s AI-powered features, even if it means slower charging and a slightly higher price.