The Oppo Reno12 F 4G and vivo V30e represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they take different approaches to performance and features. The Reno12 F 4G leverages the established Snapdragon 685, while the V30e debuts with the newer Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V30e emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Reno12 F 4G’s Snapdragon 685. While charging speeds are comparable, the V30e’s chipset offers a better long-term experience for demanding apps and gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Malaysia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Malaysia |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Malaysia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 18 | 2024, May 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Available. Released 2024, May 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back or plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 164.4 x 74.8 x 7.7 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 179 g or 188 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Schott Xensation |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS (India only)
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), AF - India
32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide) - Malaysia |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps (India only), 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0, PPS
Reverse wired | 44W wired, PD
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey | Velvet Red (Coco Brown), Silk Blue, Sky Mirror |
| Models | CPH2687 | V2339 |
| Price | - | ₹ 23,999 |
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- Proven Snapdragon 685 chipset offers reliable performance.
- 45W fast charging with PD2.0 and PPS support.
- Likely a competitive price point.
- Snapdragon 685 is less efficient than the 6 Gen 1.
- CPU architecture is older (Cortex-A73).
vivo V30e
- Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) provides superior performance and efficiency.
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A78).
- Better long-term software support potential.
- Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is a newer chipset with less real-world testing.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Reno12 F 4G.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature FHD+ LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, the absence of specific display specs necessitates a focus on the chipset's impact on UI smoothness. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the V30e, with its more capable GPU, will likely deliver a slightly more responsive experience when scrolling and navigating the interface, even if the panel itself is identical. Bezels are expected to be similar, and color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera around the 50MP mark, but sensor size and aperture are crucial. The V30e’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. Expect improved noise reduction and dynamic range. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, but is not confirmed. The 2MP macro cameras commonly found on both devices offer limited practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V30e’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo Reno12 F 4G’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm). The 4nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to less throttling under sustained load. The V30e’s CPU configuration – Cortex-A78 cores versus the Reno12 F’s A73 cores – further enhances performance. While both utilize an octa-core setup, the A78 cores are architecturally superior, providing a 15-20% performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. This advantage extends to gaming, where the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s Adreno 644 GPU will outperform the 685’s Adreno 610.
Battery Life
Both devices offer comparable charging speeds – 44W and 45W respectively – and support for PD (Power Delivery). Expect a full charge from 0-100% in approximately 60-75 minutes. The Reno12 F 4G’s battery capacity is unknown, but the V30e’s efficiency gains from the 4nm process will likely offset any potential capacity difference. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s improved power management will contribute to longer battery life during typical usage, despite potentially having a similar battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 F 4G if you prioritize a proven, reliable chipset and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the vivo V30e if you prefer a more future-proof device with better performance for gaming, multitasking, and running resource-intensive applications, even if it means opting for a newer, less-established chipset in this segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the vivo V30e handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s Adreno 644 GPU is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won’t match flagship performance, it offers a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 685.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno12 F 4G support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
While not explicitly stated, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G, being a relatively recent device, is highly likely to support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) for enhanced call quality and network connectivity. However, compatibility depends on your carrier.
❓ How does the 4nm process of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 impact long-term performance?
The 4nm process results in lower heat generation under load. This means the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the vivo V30e will experience less thermal throttling during prolonged gaming or intensive tasks, maintaining higher sustained performance compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 685.
