Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Realme 12 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Realme 12 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and significantly faster 67W charging outweigh the Reno12 F’s lower price point. However, the Reno12 F remains a viable option for those on a strict budget and primarily needing basic smartphone functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 F 4G | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 18 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0, PPS Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | CPH2687 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | - | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- More affordable price point
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Supports 45W fast charging
- Significantly weaker processor
- Likely limited to 60Hz display
- Potentially lower camera quality
Realme 12 Pro+
- Powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Faster 67W charging
- Brighter display with potentially 120Hz refresh rate
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- No information on display technology beyond brightness
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 802 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno12 F. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market trends), the higher peak brightness of the 12 Pro+ ensures better visibility outdoors. The absence of refresh rate data for the Reno12 F suggests it may be limited to 60Hz, while the 12 Pro+ is likely to offer a smoother 120Hz experience. This difference will be noticeable during scrolling and gaming. Bezels are expected to be similar, but the 12 Pro+'s brighter panel provides a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for either device, analysis relies on brand positioning. Realme typically emphasizes camera capabilities in its 'Pro+' line. The 12 Pro+ likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms than the Reno12 F. While both may include multiple lenses, the Reno12 F’s camera system is likely geared towards casual photography, while the 12 Pro+ aims for more detailed and versatile image capture. The absence of OIS information for both phones is a drawback, but the 12 Pro+'s superior chipset could potentially compensate with more effective software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo Reno12 F’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm). The 7s Gen 2 features newer Cortex-A78 cores, offering a substantial performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 4nm process node also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling. While both phones feature 8GB of RAM (assumed based on market positioning), the 12 Pro+ will handle demanding applications and multitasking with greater ease. The Reno12 F is adequate for basic use, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or heavy app switching.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in charging speed with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. The Oppo Reno12 F’s 45W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. While the battery capacity of the Reno12 F is unknown, the 12 Pro+’s active use score of 13:24h demonstrates strong battery life. The faster charging of the 12 Pro+ is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The more efficient 4nm process of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 also contributes to the 12 Pro+'s longer battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 F 4G if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and are constrained by a tight budget. You'll appreciate its ease of use and respectable battery life. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and significantly faster charging – especially if you frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. The 12 Pro+ offers a more robust experience for power users.