Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset and advanced image processing deliver significantly better photos and a smoother overall experience. However, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G offers faster charging and may appeal to those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 F 4G | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 18 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0, PPS Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | CPH2687 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | - | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- 45W SuperVOOC charging is significantly faster.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Reverse wired charging offers added versatility.
- Snapdragon 685 chipset is less powerful than the Tensor G2.
- Camera performance likely lags behind the Pixel 7a.
Google Pixel 7a
- Google Tensor G2 offers superior performance and AI capabilities.
- Exceptional camera quality with Google’s computational photography.
- Guaranteed software updates and a clean Android experience.
- Slower 18W charging compared to the Oppo Reno12 F 4G.
- Higher price point.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno12 F 4G. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Pixel 7a’s higher brightness and Google’s color calibration expertise provide a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The Reno12 F 4G’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more budget-oriented panel.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a excels in camera capabilities thanks to Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 7a’s image processing pipeline leverages the Tensor G2’s AI capabilities to produce consistently excellent photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Reno12 F 4G likely relies more on hardware and less on software optimization. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s advanced video processing features. We can assume the Pixel 7a has OIS, while the Reno12 F 4G's stabilization is unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a tri-cluster configuration with high-performance Cortex-X1 cores, offering a substantial performance advantage over the Oppo Reno12 F 4G’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm). The Tensor G2’s architecture (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) is designed for AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. The Snapdragon 685 (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) is a capable chip for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games and intensive multitasking compared to the Pixel 7a. The Pixel 7a’s LPDDR5x RAM further contributes to faster app loading and smoother performance.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life despite its 18W charging. The Oppo Reno12 F 4G, however, boasts a significantly faster 45W charging solution with PD2.0 and PPS support, allowing for a much quicker 0-100% charge time. While the Reno12 F 4G’s battery capacity is unspecified, the faster charging speed is a major advantage for users who prioritize convenience. The Pixel 7a also supports 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno12 F 4G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 F 4G if you need a phone with exceptionally fast 45W charging and prioritize value over raw performance. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost and don’t heavily rely on demanding applications. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a superior camera system, a cleaner Android experience with guaranteed updates, and a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.