The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro and Oppo Reno12 (China) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-to-high range smartphone market. The K70 Pro aims for near-flagship performance at a disruptive price, while the Reno12 focuses on a balanced experience with a strong emphasis on design and fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly more processing power than the Reno12’s Dimensity 8250. However, the Reno12 offers a compelling alternative for those valuing a potentially more refined software experience and slightly faster wired charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8250 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD
Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, peach | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | PJV110 | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 430 EUR |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Faster 80W wired charging with reverse wireless.
- Potentially more refined ColorOS software experience.
- Sleek design aesthetic (assumed based on Oppo's branding).
- Less powerful Dimensity 8250 chipset.
- Potentially lower peak display brightness.
- Missing telephoto lens (likely).
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset.
- Faster 120W wired charging.
- Superior GPU performance for gaming.
- MIUI software can be polarizing.
- No reverse wireless charging.
- Potentially less emphasis on design refinement.
Display Comparison
While both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, display details are missing. Assuming both employ AMOLED panels (typical for this segment), the key differentiators will be peak brightness, refresh rate, and PWM dimming frequency. Given Xiaomi’s history with high-end displays, the K70 Pro likely boasts a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The Reno12 may prioritize color accuracy and potentially a more energy-efficient panel.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, but we can infer based on brand positioning. Xiaomi typically focuses on high-resolution sensors, potentially including a 50MP or higher main sensor with OIS in the K70 Pro. Oppo often emphasizes image processing and color science. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the K70 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 will likely provide better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of information on telephoto lenses is notable; their presence (or lack thereof) would significantly impact the camera comparison.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Oppo Reno12’s Mediatek Dimensity 8250 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, alongside Cortex-A720 performance cores, offering superior single-core and multi-core performance. The Dimensity 8250, while capable, utilizes older Cortex-A78 cores and a less efficient core configuration. This translates to a noticeable advantage for the K70 Pro in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The K70 Pro’s Adreno 750 GPU also eclipses the Dimensity 8250’s Mali-G715 MC11. Both likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s superior memory controller will further enhance performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a substantial advantage over the Reno12’s 80W charging. Xiaomi claims a full charge in just 18 minutes, while the Reno12 will take considerably longer. While battery capacity is unknown for both, the faster charging speed of the K70 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery. Both support PD charging, offering compatibility with a wider range of chargers. The Reno12 adds reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the K70 Pro, which could be useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 (China) if you need a phone with a focus on design aesthetics, a potentially smoother software experience (depending on ColorOS preference), and prioritize 80W fast charging with reverse wireless capabilities. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prefer uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, require the latest Snapdragon chipset, and value the fastest possible 120W wired charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8250 in the Oppo Reno12 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 8250 is a capable chipset, but it will likely require reduced graphics settings and potentially experience some thermal throttling during extended Genshin Impact sessions. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the K70 Pro will handle the game at higher settings with more consistent performance.
❓ Does the 120W charging on the Redmi K70 Pro degrade the battery health faster than the 80W charging on the Reno12?
While faster charging generates more heat, modern smartphones employ sophisticated battery management systems to mitigate degradation. The difference in long-term battery health between 80W and 120W charging is likely to be minimal, especially with careful charging habits. The convenience of the K70 Pro’s faster charging outweighs the potential for slightly accelerated degradation.
❓ Is the lack of a microSD card slot a dealbreaker on either device?
Neither device is confirmed to have a microSD card slot. This means storage is fixed at the time of purchase. Consider your storage needs carefully and opt for a higher storage configuration if you anticipate storing a large number of photos, videos, or apps.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Oppo's ColorOS and Xiaomi's MIUI?
ColorOS is generally considered to be a more polished and refined software experience, with a focus on aesthetics and user-friendliness. MIUI, while feature-rich, can be more prone to bloatware and occasional inconsistencies. Software preference is subjective, but ColorOS may appeal to users seeking a cleaner interface.
