Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Oppo Reno12: A Deep Dive into Performance, Charging, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and the fastest possible charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ offers a significant leap over the Reno12’s Dimensity 8250, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the Reno12 remains a strong contender for those seeking a refined experience at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8250 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, peach | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | PJV110 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Streamlined software experience (typical of Oppo)
- Less powerful Dimensity 8250 chipset
- No wireless charging support
- Limited camera information available
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Significantly faster Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price point
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo Reno12’s display specifications are not provided, Xiaomi’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting similar power efficiency in display operation. The 14T Pro’s higher brightness is particularly beneficial for outdoor photography and video consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo Reno12, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging the processing power of the Dimensity 9300+ for improved image quality and computational photography. The Reno12’s camera performance will likely be solid, but the 14T Pro’s chipset provides headroom for more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS for the Reno12 makes a definitive assessment impossible.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi 14T Pro features the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+, while the Oppo Reno12 utilizes the Dimensity 8250. The 9300+’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.4 GHz, represents a substantial architectural upgrade over the Reno12’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. This translates to a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 14T Pro’s chipset also benefits from newer GPU architecture, further widening the performance gap. While both are built on a 4nm process, the 9300+'s more advanced design yields superior efficiency and sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo Reno12’s 80W charging. The 14T Pro also supports 50W wireless charging, a feature absent in the Reno12. While the 14T Pro’s active use battery score of 12:32h is a good benchmark, the Reno12’s battery capacity is unknown. The 14T Pro’s charging speed mitigates any potential disadvantage in battery capacity, offering unparalleled convenience for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 (China) if you need a well-rounded smartphone with a focus on efficient performance for everyday tasks and appreciate a potentially more streamlined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize maximum performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast wired and wireless charging. The 14T Pro is geared towards power users.