Oppo Reno12 (China) vs vivo X100 Ultra: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value, the Oppo Reno12 offers a compelling package. However, the vivo X100 Ultra emerges as the superior choice for power users and photography enthusiasts, thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and exceptional battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 (China) | vivo X100 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, May 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2024, May 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 164.1 x 75.6 x 9.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 229 g (8.08 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8250 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, OriginOS 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 30W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, peach | Titanium, White, Grey |
| Models | PJV110 | V2366GA, V2366HA |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 980 EUR |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Capable Dimensity 8250 processor for everyday use
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Likely inferior camera system
- Unknown display brightness and technology
vivo X100 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Long-lasting battery life (12:55h active use)
- Bright and likely high-quality display (1801 nits)
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic smartphone users
- Larger size and weight potentially
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1801 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno12’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower. The X100 Ultra’s brightness advantage is crucial for outdoor usability. We expect the X100 Ultra to utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, further enhancing power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Reno12. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the Reno12, but the X100 Ultra is expected to deliver a flagship-level viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Reno12, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the X100 Ultra is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, likely with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing. The X100 Ultra’s focus on high-end photography suggests features like advanced computational photography algorithms and potentially a variable aperture. The Reno12 may offer a versatile camera setup, but the X100 Ultra is positioned to deliver professional-grade image quality. We can assume the X100 Ultra will have superior OIS and low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X100 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno12’s Mediatek Dimensity 8250 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 features the newer Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, compared to the Reno12’s Cortex-A78 at 3.1 GHz. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The X100 Ultra’s CPU configuration (1+3+2+2) is also more balanced for sustained workloads. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architecture offers improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X100 Ultra will likely pair this with faster LPDDR5x RAM, further boosting performance.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 12 hours and 55 minutes of active use. While the Reno12’s battery capacity is unknown, the X100 Ultra’s endurance is a significant benefit for heavy users. Both support 80W wired charging, but the X100 Ultra adds 30W wireless charging, PPS, QC, and UFCS, offering greater charging flexibility. The X100 Ultra also supports reverse wired and wireless charging, a feature likely present on the Reno12 but with potentially slower speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 (China) if you need a well-rounded smartphone with fast 80W charging and a capable processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the vivo X100 Ultra if you prioritize top-tier performance, extended battery life exceeding 12 hours of active use, and a premium camera experience with advanced features.