Oppo Reno12 (China) vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term reliability and a consistently smooth experience, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE emerges as the stronger choice. Its superior battery endurance, coupled with a brighter display and Samsung’s established software support, outweigh the Reno12’s faster charging capabilities. However, gamers and power users may find the Reno12’s Dimensity 8250 a more appealing option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8250 (4 nm) | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 25W wired, PD, QC2, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, peach | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Models | PJV110 | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 249.74 / C$ 498.99 / £ 335.00 / € 387.00 / ₹ 34,180 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:00h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially stronger sustained CPU performance with Dimensity 8250
- Reverse wired charging capability
- China-specific software and potential lack of global updates
- Unknown display brightness and quality compared to S24 FE
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Exceptional battery life and 2000 charge cycles
- Brighter and likely more color-accurate display
- Global software support and updates from Samsung
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Exynos 2400e may be prone to throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1372 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno12’s display specifications are not provided, Oppo typically utilizes AMOLED panels; however, without peak brightness data, it’s unlikely to match the S24 FE. The S24 FE’s panel likely incorporates LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to battery efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Reno12. Color accuracy is also likely to be superior on the S24 FE, given Samsung’s display expertise.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Reno12, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the S24 FE’s camera system is expected to prioritize image processing and overall consistency. The S24 FE likely features Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor, crucial for sharp photos and stable videos. The Reno12’s camera performance will heavily rely on its image signal processor (ISP) and software algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit compared to a well-tuned main sensor.
Performance
Both devices utilize 4nm process nodes, but their chipset architectures differ significantly. The Reno12’s MediaTek Dimensity 8250 features an octa-core configuration with a single high-performance Cortex-A78 core clocked at 3.1 GHz, alongside three more Cortex-A78 cores at 3.0 GHz. This suggests a focus on sustained multi-core performance. The S24 FE’s Exynos 2400e employs a 10-core setup, with a single 3.1 GHz core, two 2.9 GHz cores, three 2.6 GHz cores, and four 1.95 GHz cores. This configuration aims for a balance between peak performance and efficiency. While the core count is higher on the Exynos, the Dimensity 8250’s more consistent high-performance core cluster may offer an edge in demanding gaming scenarios. Thermal management will be crucial for both, but the Exynos 2400e’s architecture may be more prone to throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE clearly excels in battery performance, boasting a 42-hour endurance rating and a remarkable 2000 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. Its active use score of 11 hours and 48 minutes demonstrates real-world staying power. The Reno12 compensates with an impressive 80W wired charging, capable of significantly faster top-ups. While the S24 FE supports 25W charging (reaching 50% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless charging, the Reno12’s 80W wired charging offers a substantial time advantage. The trade-off is clear: the S24 FE prioritizes longevity and sustained use, while the Reno12 prioritizes quick replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 (China) if you need blazing-fast 80W charging and prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks, and are comfortable with a China-specific software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE if you prefer all-day battery life, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s global software support and longer-term updates.