OnePlus 12R vs Oppo Reno12 (China): A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly superior performance, and the 100W charging is faster than the Reno12’s 80W. While the Reno12 offers a potentially more refined software experience (depending on ColorOS version), the 12R’s raw power and faster charging provide a more compelling overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno12 (China) | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 31 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 74.8 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8250 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, peach | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | PJV110 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- 100W SuperVOOC charging for rapid replenishment
- Excellent battery life (14:32h active use)
- Software experience may be less refined than Oppo's ColorOS
- Potentially larger and heavier build
OnePlus 12R
- Potentially more refined software experience (ColorOS)
- Competitive Dimensity 8250 performance
- 80W fast charging
- Significantly less powerful processor than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the 12R
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1181 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While the Reno12’s display specs are currently unknown, Oppo typically employs AMOLED panels. The 12R’s brightness advantage is crucial for outdoor use. We anticipate the Reno12 will likely have a standard refresh rate, while the 12R’s panel is expected to support adaptive refresh rates for smoother scrolling and improved power efficiency. The 12R’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Reno12, a direct comparison is limited. However, given Oppo’s history, we can expect a focus on image processing and potentially a larger main sensor. The OnePlus 12R likely features a capable camera system, but the Reno12 may excel in computational photography. The absence of details regarding OIS on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. We’ll need to see sample images to determine which phone delivers superior image quality. It's likely both will include a standard set of lenses, but the image processing algorithms will be the key differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo Reno12’s Dimensity 8250 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features a prime Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the Reno12’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the more advanced GPU in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, results in substantially better gaming performance and faster application loading times. The 12R’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior architecture and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable performance edge.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines in battery performance and charging speed. Its 14:32h active use score demonstrates excellent endurance. The 100W charging capability replenishes the battery to 100% in just 26 minutes, a significant advantage over the Reno12’s 80W charging. While the Reno12’s battery capacity is unknown, the 12R’s combination of battery life and charging speed provides a more convenient user experience. The faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno12 (China) if you prioritize a potentially more polished software experience and a slightly more compact form factor (assuming similar dimensions based on brand trends). Buy the OnePlus 12R if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, coupled with incredibly fast 100W charging and a longer-lasting battery life as evidenced by its 14:32h active use score.