Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Oppo Reno11: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers significantly superior performance, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. While the Reno11 offers a more refined design, the 14T Pro’s raw power and convenience justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 25 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm or 8.0 mm | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 100% in 45 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wave Green, Rock Grey | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | CPH2599 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 620 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11
- Sleek and stylish design
- Good all-around performance for everyday tasks
- 67W fast charging with reverse wired charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the 14T Pro
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially less refined design
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno11. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the 14T Pro’s superior brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (like LTPO) are missing for both, but the 14T Pro’s brightness alone gives it an edge for media consumption and outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Xiaomi 14T Pro will likely feature a more advanced camera system. The Dimensity 9300+ chipset also offers a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) capable of handling more complex image processing tasks. While both phones will likely offer capable cameras for everyday photography, the 14T Pro is expected to excel in low-light conditions and offer more advanced features. We can assume both will have a primary wide-angle lens, but the 14T Pro is more likely to include optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) features a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, alongside 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 efficiency cores. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo Reno11’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm) which utilizes 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the 9300+ offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. The Cortex-X4 cores in the 14T Pro represent a significant architectural leap over the A78 cores in the Reno11, resulting in faster processing speeds and improved responsiveness. The Reno11 will handle daily tasks adequately, but the 14T Pro is built for demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo Reno11’s 67W charging, which takes 45 minutes to reach 100%. The 14T Pro also supports 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno11. While the 14T Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 12:32h demonstrates excellent battery life. The Reno11’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed and less powerful chipset suggest it may require more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 if you prioritize a sleek design and a balanced experience with good all-around performance. It’s ideal for everyday users who value aesthetics and don’t demand the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you’re a power user who needs maximum performance for gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications, and if minimizing charging time is a top priority. It’s the clear choice for those who want a flagship-level experience without the flagship price tag.