Oppo Reno11 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is the stronger choice. Its Exynos 2400e, despite potential thermal concerns, offers more processing headroom, and the impressive 42-hour battery endurance significantly outpaces the Reno11. However, the Reno11’s 67W charging is a compelling advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 25 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm or 8.0 mm | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 100% in 45 min Reverse wired | 25W wired, PD, QC2, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wave Green, Rock Grey | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Models | CPH2599 | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N |
| Price | About 620 EUR | $ 249.74 / C$ 498.99 / £ 335.00 / € 387.00 / ₹ 34,180 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | 0.94 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:00h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Oppo Reno11
- Incredibly fast 67W wired charging
- Sleek and modern design (assumed based on Reno series)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful processor than the S24 FE
- Battery life likely inferior to the S24 FE
- Limited battery cycle life information
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Brighter and more durable display
- More powerful Exynos 2400e processor
- Exceptional battery life and 2000 cycle rating
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Higher price compared to the Reno11
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1372 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Reno11 (brightness data unavailable). While the Reno11’s panel quality is likely good, Samsung’s experience in display technology is evident. The S24 FE’s panel is likely to have better color accuracy and viewing angles. We expect the S24 FE to have a higher refresh rate as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, though this is not specified in the data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Samsung typically prioritizes camera performance in its FE line, suggesting the S24 FE will likely have a more sophisticated camera system. The Reno11’s camera performance will likely be good for its price point, but the S24 FE’s image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor size (based on Samsung’s history) will likely result in better low-light performance and dynamic range. We can assume both phones will have capable main sensors, but the S24 FE is more likely to offer features like advanced video stabilization and more versatile shooting modes.
Performance
The Exynos 2400e in the S24 FE, with its 10-core architecture and 3.1 GHz peak clock speed, demonstrably outpaces the Reno11’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050. The Dimensity 7050’s octa-core setup, while efficient, is built on a 6nm process compared to the S24 FE’s 4nm node, meaning the Exynos chip benefits from improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. The S24 FE’s more complex CPU configuration suggests superior multitasking capabilities. However, the Dimensity 7050 is still a capable chip for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE’s battery life is a clear winner. The reported 42-hour endurance and 11:48-hour active use score significantly exceed what we’d expect from the Reno11, which lacks specific battery life data. While the Reno11’s 67W charging is incredibly fast – promising a full charge in 45 minutes – the S24 FE’s 25W charging, while slower, is still respectable and complemented by 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. The S24 FE’s battery is also rated for 2000 cycles, suggesting exceptional long-term durability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and a streamlined user experience, and frequently find yourself needing to top up your phone quickly. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE if you value a brighter, more durable display, longer battery life, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, even if it means slightly slower charging.