Oppo Reno11 vs Realme 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery longevity, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a more efficient 4nm process, delivers a noticeable advantage in real-world usage, complemented by its impressive 13:24 hour active use battery score.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm or 8.0 mm | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 100% in 45 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wave Green, Rock Grey | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | CPH2599 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | About 620 EUR | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo Reno11
- Potentially smoother software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds on primary cores
- Less efficient chipset (6nm vs 4nm)
- Likely shorter battery life
- Slower full charge time
Realme 12 Pro+
- More efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Longer battery life (13:24h active use)
- Brighter display (802 nits)
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- ColorOS may not appeal to all users
- Potentially less refined camera software (unconfirmed)
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 802 nits, making it more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Reno11 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit. The absence of refresh rate data for the Reno11 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Realme’s panel is likely to offer a smoother experience if it supports a high refresh rate. Bezels are assumed to be comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will likely depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+’s focus on camera marketing suggests a potentially more refined image processing pipeline. Sensor size and aperture are critical factors, and any difference here would significantly impact low-light performance. The absence of information on Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for either device makes it difficult to assess video stabilization capabilities. We can assume both phones will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the Realme’s marketing suggests a stronger emphasis on camera quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), while the Oppo Reno11 features the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 4nm process of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially reduced throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores clock slightly higher (2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), the Snapdragon’s architecture and process node give it an edge in sustained performance. The CPU core count is identical (2+6), but the Snapdragon’s Cortex-A78 cores are generally more efficient. RAM speed is not specified, but both are likely to utilize LPDDR4x or LPDDR5.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 13:24 hours of active use. While the Oppo Reno11’s battery capacity is unknown, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s efficiency likely contributes significantly to the Realme’s longevity. Both phones support 67W wired charging, but the Realme charges to 50% in 19 minutes, while the Reno11 takes 45 minutes for a full charge. This indicates a potentially faster charging curve on the Realme, despite the same wattage. The Reno11 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent from the Realme’s specifications.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 if you prioritize a sleek design and a potentially smoother software experience within the Oppo ecosystem. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value longer battery life, more efficient performance under sustained loads, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. The Realme is the better choice for gamers and power users.