OnePlus 12R vs. Oppo Reno11: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the OnePlus 12R is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and 100W charging significantly outperform the Reno11’s Dimensity 7050 and 67W charging. However, the Reno11 offers a more refined design and may appeal to those seeking a sleeker, more everyday-focused experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 25 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm or 8.0 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 100% in 45 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wave Green, Rock Grey | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | CPH2599 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 620 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11
- Faster 67W charging with PD/QC3 support.
- Potentially more stylish and refined design (based on Oppo’s brand image).
- Efficient Dimensity 7050 chipset for everyday tasks.
- Significantly less powerful chipset compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.
- Slower charging speed than the OnePlus 12R.
- Limited information available regarding display specifications.
OnePlus 12R
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance.
- Extremely fast 100W charging (0-100% in 26 minutes).
- Bright 1181 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Long-lasting battery life (14:32h active use).
- Potentially less refined design compared to Oppo’s offerings.
- May run warmer under sustained load due to higher performance.
- Larger form factor potentially.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1181 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno11. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 12R’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO vs. standard AMOLED) are missing for the Reno11, but the 12R’s display is demonstrably superior in terms of peak luminance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Reno11, a direct comparison is limited. However, the OnePlus 12R is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging the processing power of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for superior image processing. The Reno11 likely focuses on software enhancements and portrait modes, typical of Oppo’s camera strategy. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS on the Reno11 makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the 12R.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno11’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features a 1x Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2GHz, alongside higher-performing Cortex-A715 and A710 cores, offering significantly greater CPU and GPU horsepower. The 4nm process node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Reno11’s Dimensity 7050, while capable, relies on older Cortex-A78 and A55 cores and a less efficient 6nm process, resulting in lower peak performance and potentially more heat generation.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines in battery and charging. It achieves an impressive 14:32h of active use, indicating excellent battery life. Crucially, its 100W wired charging replenishes the battery to 100% in just 26 minutes. The Oppo Reno11, with its 67W charging, takes 45 minutes to reach full charge. While the Reno11’s battery capacity is unknown, the 12R’s combination of capacity and charging speed provides a significant convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 if you prioritize a stylish design, efficient power consumption for all-day use, and a more balanced user experience. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, coupled with incredibly fast charging speeds, and are willing to accept a potentially less refined aesthetic.