Oppo Reno11 vs Google Pixel 8a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a consistently smooth software experience, the Google Pixel 8a is the stronger choice. Its exceptional 40:06h battery endurance and Google’s Tensor G3 offer a compelling package. However, users who frequently need a quick power boost will appreciate the Reno11’s 67W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 | Google Pixel 8a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - G6GPR (International) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G6GPR (International) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2024, May 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 25 | Available. Released 2024, May 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm or 8.0 mm | 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~430 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 120Hz, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP (16 MP eff.), f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 100% in 45 min Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4492 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wave Green, Rock Grey | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Aloe |
| Models | CPH2599 | GKV4X, G6GPR, G8HHN, G576D |
| Price | About 620 EUR | $ 229.98 / C$ 417.99 / £ 279.00 / € 299.99 / ₹ 33,300 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 40:06h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo Reno11
- Extremely fast 67W wired charging
- Sleek and modern design (assumed based on Oppo's design language)
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Less efficient 6nm chipset compared to Pixel 8a
- Battery life likely shorter than Pixel 8a (data unavailable)
Google Pixel 8a
- Exceptional battery life (40:06h endurance)
- Powerful Google Tensor G3 processor
- Superior camera software and image processing
- Slower 18W wired charging
- May lack the Reno11's rapid charging convenience
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1508 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight than the Reno11 (brightness data unavailable). While the Reno11’s panel specifics are unknown, the Pixel 8a’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both likely employ OLED technology, but the Pixel 8a’s brightness and potentially higher PWM dimming rate (unspecified for either) could make it a better choice for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8a’s camera system benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography, even without detailed sensor size information. The Reno11’s camera specs are currently unknown, but the Pixel 8a’s image processing algorithms are a significant advantage, particularly in low-light conditions. Google’s software excels at dynamic range and detail preservation. While the Reno11 may offer competitive hardware, the Pixel 8a’s software optimization is likely to deliver superior image quality consistently.
Performance
The Google Pixel 8a’s Tensor G3, fabricated on a 4nm process, offers a more efficient architecture than the Reno11’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Tensor G3’s nona-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core, suggests superior peak performance, particularly in AI-driven tasks. While the Reno11’s octa-core CPU is capable, the Tensor G3’s architecture is designed for complex workloads and machine learning, giving the Pixel 8a an edge in tasks like image processing and voice recognition. The Pixel 8a’s RAM configuration (unspecified) will also impact multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 8a’s battery endurance of 40:06h is a standout feature, significantly exceeding what is typically found in this price range. This is coupled with a 1000 cycle lifespan, suggesting long-term reliability. The Reno11 compensates with 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes, a substantial advantage over the Pixel 8a’s 18W charging. The Pixel 8a also supports 7.5W wireless charging and 'bypass charging', which minimizes battery degradation during charging, but the Reno11’s speed is a clear win for those who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 if you need blazing-fast 67W charging and prioritize topping up quickly, even if it means more frequent charging cycles. Buy the Google Pixel 8a if you value exceptional battery life, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and Google’s computational photography prowess. The Pixel 8a is ideal for users who want a phone that lasts all day and beyond.