Asus Zenfone 10 vs Oppo Reno11: A Detailed Comparison of Power and Style
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and long-term software support, the Asus Zenfone 10 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly superior performance. However, the Oppo Reno11 offers a compelling package for those valuing aesthetics and rapid 67W charging, making it a strong contender for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 | Asus Zenfone 10 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2023, June 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 25 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm or 8.0 mm | 146.5 x 68.1 x 9.4 mm (5.77 x 2.68 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~445 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.92 inches, 84.6 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120° (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 100% in 45 min Reverse wired | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, QC4 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wave Green, Rock Grey | Starry Blue, Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Eclipse Red, Comet White |
| Models | CPH2599 | AI2302 |
| Price | About 620 EUR | About 2300 EUR |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo Reno11
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Excellent battery life and endurance
- Compact and pocketable design
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Potentially higher price point
Asus Zenfone 10
- Faster charging (67W, 45 min to 100%)
- Stylish design and build quality
- Potentially more affordable price
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7050)
- Likely lower performance in demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno11’s display specifications are not provided, but based on Oppo’s typical offerings, it likely features an OLED panel. The Asus Zenfone 10 boasts a measured peak brightness of 807 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in bright sunlight. While the Reno11 may offer comparable color accuracy, the Zenfone 10’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage in outdoor use. The Zenfone 10’s smaller size (due to its overall compact design) also contributes to a higher pixel density, potentially resulting in a sharper image.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Reno11 are missing, but Oppo typically emphasizes image processing and portrait photography. The Zenfone 10’s camera capabilities are not fully detailed in the provided data, but its performance will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing algorithms. Without knowing the sensor sizes, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Zenfone 10’s flagship positioning suggests a more advanced camera system overall, potentially offering better low-light performance and dynamic range. We'll assume the Reno11 will lean into software enhancements for portrait mode.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Asus Zenfone 10’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside high-performance Cortex-A715 and A710 cores. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo Reno11’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). While the Dimensity 7050 is a capable mid-range chip, its Cortex-A78 and A55 cores are architecturally older and less efficient than those found in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon further enhances thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly benefit from the Zenfone 10’s superior processing power.
Battery Life
The Asus Zenfone 10 achieves an impressive active use score of 13:05h and an endurance rating of 109h, indicating excellent battery life despite its compact size. The Oppo Reno11’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 67W wired charging is significantly faster than the Zenfone 10’s 30W charging. The Reno11 can reach 100% charge in just 45 minutes, while the Zenfone 10 will take considerably longer. The Zenfone 10 also offers 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wired charging, while the Reno11 offers reverse wired charging. The Reno11’s faster charging is a key advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups, while the Zenfone 10 excels in overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 if you need a phone with a focus on design, fast charging, and a generally smooth user experience for everyday tasks like social media, streaming, and photography. Buy the Asus Zenfone 10 if you prefer a compact, powerful device capable of handling demanding games, intensive multitasking, and benefit from the latest flagship chipset and longer software support.