Xiaomi 13 Pro vs Oppo Reno11 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and sustained performance, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and superior charging speeds justify the price premium. However, the Oppo Reno11 Pro offers a strong value proposition with a capable processor and fast 80W charging, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 18 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm or 7.7 mm | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | CPH2607 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | ₹ 29,998 | About 750 EUR |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno11 Pro
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Significantly faster 120W wired charging
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging capabilities
- Likely higher price point
- Potential for higher thermal output under extreme load
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Stylish design and potentially lighter weight
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Missing wireless charging features
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 1253 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in direct sunlight compared to what we'd expect from the Reno11 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate OLED panels, the Xiaomi’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), indicating deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno11 Pro’s display characteristics are less defined in the provided data, making a direct comparison difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume it prioritizes color accuracy and viewing angles within its segment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics. We can infer that the Xiaomi 13 Pro, being a flagship, likely features a larger sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Reno11 Pro’s camera system is likely optimized for social media sharing and portrait photography, leveraging Oppo’s established expertise in this area. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but the Xiaomi’s flagship status suggests a more versatile and capable camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a more advanced CPU architecture – Cortex-X3, A715, and A710 cores – compared to the Oppo Reno11 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm) with its Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. This translates to a performance advantage for the Xiaomi, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks and sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior thermal efficiency, stemming from the 4nm node and architectural optimizations, will likely result in less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Dimensity 8200 is no slouch, it’s positioned as a high-end rather than a flagship-level processor.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in charging speed with its 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Oppo Reno11 Pro’s 80W charging, while still fast, takes longer. The Xiaomi also offers 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features not explicitly mentioned for the Reno11 Pro. Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours and active use score of 10:55h, suggesting comparable battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (data unavailable for Reno11 Pro). The Xiaomi’s faster charging mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro if you need a stylish, well-rounded flagship with excellent fast charging and a focus on everyday usability. It’s perfect for social media enthusiasts and those who value a balance between performance and price. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prefer top-tier performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, coupled with the fastest possible charging and a potentially more robust camera system.