Oppo Reno11 Pro vs vivo X100 Pro: Which Dimensity Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X100 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Dimensity 9300 chipset provides a significant performance uplift, coupled with a brighter display and longer battery life. While the Reno11 Pro offers a compelling value proposition, the X100 Pro justifies its price with tangible improvements in key areas.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 18 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm or 7.7 mm | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | CPH2607 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | ₹ 29,998 | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Sleek and stylish design (based on Oppo’s brand image)
- Less powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Potentially less advanced display
vivo X100 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 9300 chipset
- Brighter display (1472 nits)
- Longer battery life (13:53h active use)
- Higher price
- Slightly slower initial charging speed (50% in 14 min)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1472 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno11 Pro. This translates to superior visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the X100 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO) are missing for the Reno11 Pro, but the X100 Pro’s brightness suggests a more advanced display overall. Bezels are likely comparable given both brands’ focus on aesthetics, but the X100 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a decisive advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The context data highlights 'Photo / Video' capabilities for the X100 Pro, but lacks specifics. However, vivo’s flagship X-series is renowned for its camera prowess, suggesting a more sophisticated system than the Reno11 Pro. Sensor size, OIS implementation, and lens apertures are unknown for both, but the X100 Pro is likely to feature a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Reno11 Pro’s camera is likely competent, but the X100 Pro is positioned as a camera-centric device, implying a significant advantage in image quality and video recording capabilities. We can assume both will have a standard suite of lenses, but the X100 Pro will likely excel in low-light performance and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Reno11 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm), while the X100 Pro features the newer Dimensity 9300 (4nm). The 9300’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – represents a substantial architectural upgrade over the Reno11 Pro’s 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The Cortex-X4 cores in the 9300 deliver significantly improved single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The X100 Pro’s GPU will also offer a considerable advantage in gaming. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the 9300’s superior processing power will allow it to be utilized more effectively. Thermal management will be critical for the X100 Pro to sustain peak performance, a factor not detailed in the provided data.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 13:53h. While the Reno11 Pro’s battery capacity is unspecified, the X100 Pro’s longer runtime suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. Charging speeds differ significantly: the X100 Pro supports 100W wired charging (50% in 14 min) and 50W wireless, while the Reno11 Pro offers 80W wired (45% in 10 min) and reverse wired charging. The X100 Pro’s wireless charging is a key differentiator. The Reno11 Pro’s faster initial charging burst (45% in 10 min) is offset by the X100 Pro’s overall faster charging and longer battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro if you prioritize a sleek design and fast 80W charging at a potentially lower price point, and don't require the absolute peak performance offered by the latest flagship chipsets. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you demand the best possible performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, value a superior camera system, and appreciate the convenience of 50W wireless charging and a brighter, more visible display in direct sunlight.