Oppo Reno11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy S23+ is the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a noticeable edge in demanding tasks and sustained performance. However, the Oppo Reno11 Pro offers compelling value with its 80W charging and competitive feature set, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S23+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 18 | Available. Released 2023, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm or 7.7 mm | 157.8 x 76.2 x 7.6 mm (6.21 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM and eSIM or Dual SIM (2 Nano-SIMs and eSIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Dual video call, Auto-HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min (advertised) 15W wireless (Qi/PMA) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Ion 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Phantom Black, Cream, Green, Lavender, Graphite, Lime |
| Models | CPH2607 | SM-S916B, SM-S916B/DS, SM-S916U, SM-S916U1, SM-S916W, SM-S916N, SM-S9160, SM-S916E, SM-S916E/DS |
| Price | ₹ 29,998 | $ 780.00 / C$ 1,399.99 / £ 919.08 / € 1,185.89 / ₹ 94,999 |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | 0.95 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 111h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1234077 (v9) GeekBench: 5073 (v5.1) GFXBench: 110fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno11 Pro
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Sleek and modern design
- Less powerful processor than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Likely less refined software experience
- Limited charging options (no wireless)
Samsung Galaxy S23+
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Excellent battery life and efficiency
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 45W wired charging
- Higher price tag
- Software can be feature-rich but sometimes bloated
Display Comparison
While the context data lacks specific display details for the Reno11 Pro, both devices utilize 4nm chipsets which indirectly contribute to display efficiency. The Galaxy S23+ boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a high-quality OLED panel. The Reno11 Pro likely employs a similar OLED technology, but without specific nit brightness or refresh rate data, it's difficult to assess a clear advantage. The S23+'s display benefits from Samsung's extensive display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target a premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't detail camera specs beyond the existence of photo/video capabilities. However, Samsung typically excels in image processing and computational photography. The S23+ likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image stabilization (OIS) than the Reno11 Pro. While Oppo has improved its camera performance, Samsung’s experience and software algorithms generally produce more consistent and detailed images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of sensor size information for the Reno11 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but Samsung’s flagship typically prioritizes larger sensors for improved low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy S23+'s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a clear step up from the Oppo Reno11 Pro's Dimensity 8200 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features the newer Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.36 GHz, compared to the Reno11 Pro’s Cortex-A78 at 3.1 GHz. This translates to faster single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Snapdragon’s architecture (1+2+2+3) is also more efficient than the Reno11 Pro’s (1+3+4), leading to better sustained performance under load. While both use a 4nm process, Qualcomm’s optimizations generally result in superior thermal management, minimizing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The S23+ also benefits from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Galaxy S23+ boasts an endurance rating of 111 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Reno11 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the S23+’s larger battery combined with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s efficiency provides a significant advantage. The Reno11 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving 45% charge in just 10 minutes, far exceeding the S23+'s advertised 65% in 30 minutes. However, the S23+ offers 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent from the Reno11 Pro’s charging specifications. The faster wired charging of the Reno11 Pro is ideal for users who frequently need a quick top-up, while the S23+ prioritizes overall battery longevity and wireless convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro if you need exceptionally fast charging – 80W significantly outperforms the S23+'s 45W – and prioritize a sleek design with a focus on everyday tasks and social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23+ if you prefer a more polished software experience, demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the longevity of Samsung's software support and ecosystem.