OnePlus 12R vs Oppo Reno11 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, particularly for demanding tasks like gaming, and its 100W charging is substantially faster than the Reno11 Pro’s 80W. While the Reno11 Pro offers a sleek design, the 12R’s raw power and charging speed are hard to ignore.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 18 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm or 7.7 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | CPH2607 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | ₹ 29,998 | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Significantly faster 100W charging
- Longer battery life (14:32h active use)
- Potentially less refined software experience (OnePlus)
- Design may be less premium than Reno11 Pro
OnePlus 12R
- Sleek and stylish design
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo)
- 80W fast charging is still convenient
- Dimensity 8200 processor is less powerful
- Slower charging compared to OnePlus 12R
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1181 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno11 Pro. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 12R’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO vs standard) are missing for the Reno11 Pro, but the 12R’s display is demonstrably brighter, impacting outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the OnePlus 12R may prioritize a more versatile camera system. Both phones likely feature a primary camera with OIS, but sensor size and lens aperture are crucial factors missing from the provided data. The Reno11 Pro’s focus on design might mean compromises in camera hardware, while the 12R, aiming for a broader appeal, could offer a more robust camera experience. We can assume both will have a standard ultrawide and potentially a macro lens, but the quality will depend on the sensor and image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo Reno11 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features a prime Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 cores, offering superior single-core and multi-core performance. The Reno11 Pro’s Dimensity 8200, with its Cortex-A78 cores, is still capable, but will show its limitations in graphically intensive games and demanding applications. The 4nm fabrication process on both chips contributes to efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture is more advanced, leading to better sustained performance and thermal management.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines in battery and charging. It achieves an impressive 14:32 hours of active use, suggesting excellent battery life. Crucially, its 100W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 26 minutes. The Oppo Reno11 Pro’s 80W charging, while still fast, takes longer and delivers 45% charge in 10 minutes, falling behind the 12R’s speed. While the Reno11 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the 12R’s combination of long-lasting battery life and incredibly fast charging is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro if you prioritize a more streamlined software experience and a potentially more refined aesthetic. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks and media consumption. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, multitasking, or content creation, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. It’s the clear choice for power users.