Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate vs. Oppo Reno11 Pro: A Deep Dive into Gaming and Everyday Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For dedicated mobile gamers, the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate is the clear winner, offering a superior chipset and optimized thermal design. However, the Oppo Reno11 Pro provides a more refined everyday experience with its faster 80W charging and sleek aesthetic, making it ideal for users prioritizing style and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (Up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 12 | 2023, April 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 18 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm or 7.7 mm | 173 x 77 x 10.3 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 239 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | Built-in motorized cooling air vent (AeroActive Portal) IP54 water resistant 2" OLED display (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 NTFS support for external storage | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), DisplayPort 1.4; USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Storm White |
| Models | CPH2607 | - |
| Price | ₹ 29,998 | About 780 EUR |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1325105 (v9) GeekBench: 5139 (v5.5), 5567 (v6) GFXBench: 107fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno11 Pro
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly fast top-ups.
- Sleek and stylish design with a focus on aesthetics.
- Balanced feature set suitable for everyday use.
- Dimensity 8200 chipset is less powerful than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.
- Limited gaming-specific features compared to the ROG Phone.
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers unparalleled gaming performance.
- Advanced cooling system prevents thermal throttling.
- High refresh rate display for smooth visuals.
- Bulky design and less refined aesthetics.
- Slower 65W charging compared to the Reno11 Pro.
Display Comparison
The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate boasts a peak brightness of 1095 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno11 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo typically utilizes AMOLED panels known for vibrant colors. The ROG Phone’s infinite contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED technology, delivers deep blacks. The ROG Phone’s higher refresh rate (likely 165Hz, based on previous models) will provide smoother visuals during gaming compared to the Reno11 Pro, which is likely capped at 120Hz. The ROG Phone’s larger display size is also beneficial for immersive gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Reno11 Pro. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s camera system is likely optimized for general use, while Oppo typically focuses on computational photography and portrait modes. Without specific sensor details for the Reno11 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range. The ROG Phone’s video recording capabilities are likely enhanced by its powerful processor, enabling higher resolutions and frame rates. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno11 Pro makes a direct comparison challenging, but Oppo’s reputation suggests a strong emphasis on image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), while the Reno11 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s CPU configuration – 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 – offers a performance advantage over the Reno11 Pro’s 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better sustained performance in demanding games. The ROG Phone’s advanced cooling system further mitigates thermal throttling, maintaining peak performance for longer durations. While the Dimensity 8200 is a capable chip, it’s positioned a tier below the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in terms of raw power.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate likely achieves this with a larger battery capacity, necessary to power its more demanding chipset and display. The Reno11 Pro compensates with significantly faster 80W wired charging, achieving 45% charge in just 10 minutes, compared to the ROG Phone’s 65W charging which takes 42 minutes for a full charge. The Reno11 Pro’s faster charging is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery. Both phones offer 10W reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro if you need a stylish, fast-charging phone with a capable camera for everyday use and light gaming. Its 80W charging and balanced feature set make it perfect for users who value convenience and aesthetics. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate if you prioritize uncompromising gaming performance, extended battery life during intense sessions, and are willing to accept a bulkier design for features like AirTriggers and a superior cooling system.