Oppo Reno11 Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14 Pro emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a significant performance uplift over the Reno11 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and the addition of 50W wireless charging adds convenience. While the Reno11 Pro offers a competitive experience, the 14 Pro’s future-proofing and faster charging justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 01 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74.2 x 8.2 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.32 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 27 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | PJJ110 | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 650 EUR |
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
- Excellent value for the performance offered.
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is still very capable.
- 80W wired charging is fast and efficient.
- Older chipset compared to the Xiaomi 14 Pro.
- Lacks wireless charging.
- Potentially limited global software support.
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance.
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging.
- Likely superior camera system and image processing.
- Higher price point.
- Increased power consumption may lead to more heat.
- Software bloat (typical of Xiaomi).
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, the context data doesn't provide specifics. However, given Xiaomi’s track record, the 14 Pro likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to better battery efficiency. The Reno11 Pro, while still excellent, may lack these advanced features. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but Xiaomi often prioritizes maximizing screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera innovation, and the 14 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Reno11 Pro’s camera system is expected to be very good, but the 14 Pro likely offers superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is expected on both, but the quality and effectiveness may differ. We can assume both will offer excellent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial leap over the Oppo Reno11 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 8 Gen 3 features a new CPU architecture (Cortex-X4) and improved GPU, resulting in approximately 20-30% faster CPU and GPU performance. The 14 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) is more efficient and powerful than the Reno11 Pro’s (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the 8 Gen 3’s memory controller is optimized for faster speeds. Thermal management will be crucial; the 8 Gen 3’s increased power demands necessitate a robust cooling system, which Xiaomi likely provides.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s charging capabilities are a clear advantage. Its 120W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 18 minutes, significantly faster than the Reno11 Pro’s 27-minute charge time. The addition of 50W wireless charging on the 14 Pro provides added convenience, while the Reno11 Pro lacks wireless charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speeds of the 14 Pro mitigate any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) if you prioritize a balance of performance and value, and are comfortable with potentially limited global software support. It’s an excellent option for users who want flagship-level performance without the top-tier price tag. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance available, value faster charging (both wired and wireless), and appreciate a more comprehensive software experience with wider global availability.