Oppo Reno11 Pro vs vivo X100 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Android Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X100 Pro is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 9300 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage, particularly in sustained workloads, and its 100W charging and longer battery life provide a more convenient experience. While the Reno11 Pro remains a capable device, it’s outmatched in core performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 01 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74.2 x 8.2 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.32 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 27 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | PJJ110 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Competitive 80W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Outperformed by Dimensity 9300 in sustained workloads
- Missing display brightness details
- Battery life likely inferior to X100 Pro
vivo X100 Pro
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9300
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Detailed camera specs are currently unavailable
- Potential for software optimization issues with a new chipset
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1472 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno11 Pro. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X100 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Details regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are missing for the Reno11 Pro, but the X100 Pro’s brightness suggests a focus on outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo/Video' are absent for the vivo X100 Pro, but its Pro designation suggests a sophisticated multi-camera system. The Reno11 Pro’s camera capabilities are also not detailed. However, given the market positioning, both phones likely feature capable main sensors with optical image stabilization (OIS). Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult, but the X100 Pro’s flagship status suggests a more advanced camera system overall. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X100 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 9300, with its unique octa-core configuration (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720), represents a significant leap over the Oppo Reno11 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). The Dimensity 9300’s all-Cortex-X4 prime core setup promises superior sustained performance and efficiency. Both are built on a 4nm process, but the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 9300 give it an edge. The Reno11 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM is standard for its class, but the X100 Pro’s RAM configuration is unspecified, potentially offering further performance gains.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Pro’s active use score of 13:53h demonstrates excellent battery life. While the Reno11 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging (with PD and QC3 support, reaching 50% in 11 minutes and 100% in 27 minutes) is competitive. However, the X100 Pro’s 100W wired charging (50% in 14 minutes) and the addition of 50W wireless charging provide greater flexibility and convenience. The X100 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature also present on the Reno11 Pro, but the wattage is unspecified for the Oppo device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) if you prioritize a proven chipset with excellent optimization and are seeking a potentially more affordable flagship experience. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance, faster charging speeds, and a longer-lasting battery, and are willing to pay a premium for MediaTek’s latest silicon.