Oppo Reno11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a complete, future-proof experience with a superior camera and display, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Reno11 Pro delivers excellent performance and fast charging at a potentially significantly lower cost, making it a compelling option for value-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 01 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74.2 x 8.2 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.32 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 27 min Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | PJJ110 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 450 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Capable Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Likely inferior camera system
- Potentially limited software support
- Display likely less bright and advanced
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Exceptional camera system
- Brighter and more advanced display
- Slower 45W wired charging
- Higher price point
- Potential for throttling under sustained load (though mitigated by improved thermal design)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra dominates in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1447 nits. While the Reno11 Pro’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s panel likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to improved battery efficiency. The S24 Ultra’s higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility, and its likely higher resolution provides sharper visuals. The Reno11 Pro, while capable, will likely fall short in these key areas.
Camera Comparison
The S24 Ultra is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, though specific details weren't provided. Samsung typically excels in image processing and sensor technology. The Reno11 Pro’s camera capabilities are unknown, but the S24 Ultra’s larger sensor size (likely) and advanced OIS will result in superior low-light performance and image stabilization. The S24 Ultra’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be more robust, with features like 8K recording and advanced stabilization modes. We can assume the S24 Ultra will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Reno11 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 3 features a new Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.39GHz, alongside improved Cortex-A720 performance cores, offering a noticeable performance uplift in both CPU and GPU tasks. The 8+ Gen 1 is still a very capable chip, but the Gen 3’s efficiency gains and raw power are substantial. The S24 Ultra also benefits from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing responsiveness. While the Reno11 Pro won’t struggle with everyday tasks, the S24 Ultra will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts impressive battery life, achieving 13:49 hours of active use. While the Reno11 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the S24 Ultra’s 45W charging. The Reno11 Pro can reach 50% charge in just 11 minutes and 100% in 27 minutes. The S24 Ultra takes 30 minutes to reach 65%. This faster charging speed could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the Reno11 Pro, providing a convenient top-up option for users on the go. The S24 Ultra’s larger battery, however, provides longer overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) if you need a powerful phone with incredibly fast 80W charging and are comfortable with potential software limitations or import considerations. You'll get flagship-level performance for less. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prioritize the best possible camera system, a brighter and more refined display, longer software support, and a more polished overall experience, and are willing to pay a premium.