Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Detailed Performance and Feature Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Magic6 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers a significant performance uplift, coupled with a brighter display and longer battery life. While the Reno11 Pro offers a strong value, the Magic6 Pro justifies its price with cutting-edge technology.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) | Honor Magic6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 01 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74.2 x 8.2 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.32 in) | 162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | NanoCrystal Shield |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 27 min Reverse wired | 80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Black, Green, Blue, Purple, White |
| Models | PJJ110 | BVL-AN16, BVL-N49 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | € 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99 |
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
- Strong value proposition with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- 80W wired charging for quick top-ups
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Older chipset compared to the Magic6 Pro
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Limited charging options (no wireless)
Honor Magic6 Pro
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Exceptionally bright 1578 nit display
- Long battery life (14:06h active use)
- Higher price point
- May not represent a massive leap for users upgrading from recent flagships
- 5W reverse wired charging is slow
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1578 nits, making it exceptionally visible outdoors. While the Reno11 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this level of brightness. The Magic6 Pro’s panel likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to improved power efficiency. The Reno11 Pro’s display quality remains unknown, but the Magic6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability and HDR content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, Honor flagships typically prioritize camera performance, and the Magic6 Pro is likely to feature a more advanced camera system. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s improved ISP (Image Signal Processor) will contribute to better image processing and low-light performance on the Magic6 Pro. The Reno11 Pro’s camera capabilities are likely solid, but the Magic6 Pro is expected to offer a more versatile and higher-quality photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno11 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), while the Honor Magic6 Pro features the newer SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, represents a substantial architectural improvement over the Reno11 Pro’s Cortex-X2. The Magic6 Pro also benefits from newer Cortex-A720 performance cores, offering increased efficiency and performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the Honor device. The Reno11 Pro’s 8+ Gen 1 remains capable, but will show its age in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic6 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving an active use score of 14:06h. While the Reno11 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Magic6 Pro’s endurance is a significant advantage. Both devices support 80W wired charging, offering relatively fast top-ups. However, the Magic6 Pro adds 66W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, providing greater charging flexibility. The Reno11 Pro only offers reverse *wired* charging, limiting its wireless convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) if you prioritize value and are comfortable with a slightly older, but still powerful, chipset. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming and multimedia consumption without needing the absolute latest and greatest. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you demand top-tier performance, a class-leading display, and extended battery life, and are willing to invest in a premium flagship experience.