Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Oppo Reno11: A Detailed Performance and Battery Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, coupled with blazing-fast 120W charging and a brighter display. While the Reno11 offers a respectable experience, the 14T Pro’s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 (China) | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 25 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 19 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | PJH110 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 320 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11 (China)
- Faster charging (67W wired, reverse wired)
- Potentially more refined software experience (China ROM)
- Efficient Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Less powerful chipset than the 14T Pro
- Unknown display brightness
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Significantly faster chipset (Dimensity 9300+)
- Brighter display (1228 nits)
- 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Longer active use battery score (12:32h)
- Potentially more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno11. This higher peak brightness translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s impact on overall power consumption should be considered. The Reno11’s display specifications are currently unknown, but the 14T Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the 14T Pro’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system, potentially featuring a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Reno11 likely prioritizes a balanced camera experience, but the 14T Pro’s chipset provides more headroom for computational photography tasks. We'll need detailed sensor information to make a definitive judgement.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi 14T Pro features the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+, while the Oppo Reno11 utilizes the Dimensity 8200. The 9300+’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.4 GHz, represents a substantial architectural leap over the Reno11’s 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78. This, combined with the 9300+'s more efficient core configuration (3x Cortex-X4 vs 3x Cortex-A78), results in demonstrably faster CPU performance. The GPU within the 9300+ also provides a significant uplift in graphics processing, benefiting gamers and users of graphically intensive applications. The Reno11’s Dimensity 8200 remains a capable performer, but it’s outmatched by the 14T Pro’s flagship-level chipset.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo Reno11’s 67W charging, which takes approximately 19 minutes to reach 50%. Furthermore, the 14T Pro adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno11. While the 14T Pro’s active use score of 12:32h is a strong indicator of battery life, the Reno11’s battery capacity is unknown. The 14T Pro’s charging speed offers a substantial convenience advantage, mitigating any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 (China) if you prioritize a balanced smartphone experience with a focus on efficient power usage and a potentially more refined software experience (depending on the China-specific ROM). Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – both wired and wireless – alongside a brighter, more visible display.