Oppo Reno11 (China) vs vivo X100 Ultra: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw power and a top-tier display, the vivo X100 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 1801 nit peak brightness offer a significant advantage. However, the Reno11 provides a compelling alternative for those seeking a more affordable option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 (China) | vivo X100 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2024, May 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 25 | Available. Released 2024, May 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 75.6 x 9.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 229 g (8.08 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, OriginOS 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 19 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 30W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Titanium, White, Grey |
| Models | PJH110 | V2366GA, V2366HA |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 980 EUR |
Oppo Reno11 (China)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Capable Dimensity 8200 processor
- Less powerful processor than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Display brightness and technology are unknown and likely inferior
vivo X100 Ultra
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Extremely bright 1801 nit display
- Faster 80W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Longer battery life (12:55h active use)
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load (though Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is improved)
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1801 nits, compared to the Reno11’s unspecified peak brightness. This difference translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno11’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the X100 Ultra likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the Reno11, but the X100 Ultra is expected to deliver a premium viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are expected to have capable camera systems, detailed sensor information for the Reno11 is missing. The X100 Ultra’s camera system is likely to be a standout feature, though specifics are unavailable. The focus should be on the main sensor size and aperture, as these directly impact low-light performance and image quality. Image processing styles will also differentiate the two, with vivo often favoring vibrant colors and Oppo leaning towards more natural tones. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered secondary features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Reno11 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm), while the X100 Ultra is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s CPU configuration – 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 – represents a substantial leap in performance over the Reno11’s 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 4nm process node in both chips offers good efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architecture is more advanced, potentially leading to better sustained performance under heavy load. The X100 Ultra benefits from faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5x) which further enhances responsiveness.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Ultra demonstrates superior battery performance with an active use score of 12:55h, indicating excellent efficiency. While the Reno11’s battery capacity is unknown, the X100 Ultra’s 80W wired charging (with PD, PPS, QC, UFCS) and 30W wireless charging provide significantly faster replenishment compared to the Reno11’s 67W wired charging (with PD, QC3). The Reno11’s 19-minute 50% charge time is respectable, but the X100 Ultra’s charging speeds will likely be faster overall.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 (China) if you need a well-rounded smartphone experience with fast 67W charging and a capable processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the vivo X100 Ultra if you prioritize uncompromising performance, a stunningly bright display, and faster 80W wired and 30W wireless charging, even at a higher price point.