OnePlus 12R vs Oppo Reno11: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, particularly for demanding tasks like gaming, and its 100W charging is substantially faster than the Reno11’s 67W. While the Reno11 offers a respectable experience, the 12R’s superior processing power justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno11 (China) | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 25 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 19 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | PJH110 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno11 (China)
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Excellent battery life (14:32h active use)
- Software experience may not appeal to all
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load (though mitigated by the 4nm process)
OnePlus 12R
- Balanced performance with Dimensity 8200
- Respectable 67W charging
- Potentially more refined Oppo software experience
- Significantly less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- China-specific model may have software limitations
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1181 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the Reno11 (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this segment). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 12R’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO vs standard AMOLED) are missing for the Reno11, but the 12R’s display is a clear standout in terms of raw luminance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Reno11, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup. The OnePlus 12R is expected to have a more advanced primary sensor, potentially with a larger sensor size and wider aperture, leading to better low-light performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) also contributes to superior image processing capabilities. We can assume the Reno11 will focus on Oppo’s established image processing style, while the 12R will lean towards OnePlus’s natural color reproduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Oppo Reno11’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores, offering superior single-core and multi-core performance. The Reno11’s Dimensity 8200, while capable, uses older Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience on the 12R. The 12R also benefits from the Snapdragon’s more mature GPU, providing better graphics performance. The 12R’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines in battery and charging. Its 100W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 26 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Reno11’s 67W charging (50% in 19 minutes). While the 12R’s battery capacity is not specified, its active use score of 14:32h demonstrates excellent battery life. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process contributes to improved power efficiency, offsetting any potential capacity difference. The Reno11’s 67W charging is still respectable, but the 12R offers a significantly faster top-up experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 (China) if you prioritize a slightly more refined software experience within the Oppo ecosystem and are comfortable with the potential limitations of a China-specific model. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and intensive applications, coupled with incredibly fast charging and a more globally supported software experience.