The Oppo Reno11 (China variant) and Huawei nova 12 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range to upper-mid-range smartphone market. While both aim for a premium feel, they diverge significantly in their core hardware – specifically, their chipsets. This comparison dissects the differences between the Mediatek Dimensity 8200 and the (unconfirmed but widely reported) Kirin 9000S, and how those differences translate into real-world user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and established software support, the Oppo Reno11 (China) emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8200, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a balance of power and thermal management that the Kirin 9000S, likely fabricated on a 7nm node, may struggle to match consistently.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 23 | 2023, December 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 163.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1224 x 2776 pixels (~449 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.76 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, HDR, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.53GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Kirin 9000S (7 nm)* the chipset is not officially confirmed |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Maleoon 910 MP4 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | HarmonyOS 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4-4.0, 27mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, 52mm (telephoto), AF, 2x optical zoom
60 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC (320-960 kbps HD audio) |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 19 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired, 3-60% in 10 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Black, Blue, White, Pink |
| Models | PJH110 | ADA-AL00 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 510 EUR |
Oppo Reno11 (China)
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Likely better sustained performance for gaming
- Established software ecosystem and updates
- Slower charging speed (67W vs 100W)
- Potentially less emphasis on selfie camera quality
Huawei nova 12 Pro
- Ultra-fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially superior selfie camera
- Huawei's aesthetic design language
- Kirin 9000S likely less efficient than Dimensity 8200
- Potential software limitations due to geopolitical factors
- Uncertain long-term software support
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the target market, both likely feature OLED panels with high refresh rates. The nova 12 Pro's marketing often emphasizes its display, suggesting a potential edge in peak brightness or color calibration. The Reno11, while likely excellent, doesn't have a similar marketing focus. Without specific nit ratings or color gamut coverage, it's difficult to declare a clear winner, but the nova 12 Pro *may* offer a slightly more visually striking experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a precise camera comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely feature multi-camera systems with a primary sensor intended for high-resolution photography. The nova 12 Pro often highlights its selfie camera, suggesting a focus on front-facing image quality. The Reno11, based on Oppo’s camera reputation, likely prioritizes balanced image processing and versatile shooting modes. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance and video stabilization capabilities. We can assume both will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno11’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200, fabricated on a 4nm process, boasts a more modern architecture and superior power efficiency compared to the Huawei nova 12 Pro’s Kirin 9000S, which is believed to be built on a 7nm node. The Dimensity 8200’s CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a strong balance of performance and efficiency. The Kirin 9000S, with its Taishan architecture, aims to compete, but the larger process node suggests potential thermal throttling under sustained load. This benefits gamers and power users on the Reno11. The Reno11 also benefits from the Dimensity 8200's integrated Mali-G610 MC4 GPU, which is a strong performer in its class.
Battery Life
The Huawei nova 12 Pro takes a clear lead in charging speed with its 100W wired charging, capable of boosting the battery from 3% to 60% in just 10 minutes. The Oppo Reno11’s 67W charging is respectable, achieving 50% charge in 19 minutes, but lags behind. While battery capacity isn't specified, the more efficient Dimensity 8200 in the Reno11 may offset the charging speed difference with longer overall battery life. The 5W reverse wired charging on both devices is a minor convenience feature.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno11 (China) if you need a phone with a proven chipset, reliable software updates, and a focus on sustained performance for gaming and demanding applications. Buy the Huawei nova 12 Pro if you prioritize extremely fast charging (100W) and are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem, potentially including limitations in app availability due to ongoing restrictions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Kirin 9000S chipset comparable to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in terms of gaming performance?
While the Kirin 9000S is a powerful chipset, it's generally believed to fall slightly behind the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in sustained gaming performance due to the 7nm process node potentially leading to more thermal throttling. The Dimensity 8200 in the Reno11 is closer in performance to the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, offering a very good gaming experience with excellent efficiency.
❓ Does the Huawei nova 12 Pro support Google Mobile Services (GMS)?
The Huawei nova 12 Pro, like many recent Huawei devices, does *not* natively support Google Mobile Services (GMS). It relies on Huawei Mobile Services (HMS) and the AppGallery. While many popular apps are available through HMS and workarounds exist for others, users may encounter compatibility issues with certain Google-dependent applications.
❓ How does the thermal management of the Dimensity 8200 compare to the Kirin 9000S during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8200's 4nm fabrication process generally results in better thermal efficiency compared to the Kirin 9000S's 7nm process. This means the Reno11 is likely to experience less throttling and maintain higher frame rates for longer periods during demanding games.
