Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Dimensity 8200 Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a potentially more streamlined software experience, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) edges out the Xiaomi 13T. While the Xiaomi 13T boasts impressive battery endurance, the Reno10 Pro’s 100W charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 9 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PHV110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 520 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Potentially streamlined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Competitive Dimensity 8200 performance
- Unspecified display brightness
- Limited battery endurance data
Xiaomi 13T
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- High peak display brightness (1264 nits)
- Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset
- Slower 67W charging
- Potential for more software bloat (Xiaomi's MIUI)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T takes a clear lead in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1264 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor use, where the Reno10 Pro’s brightness remains unspecified. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 13T’s higher peak brightness translates to a more vibrant and readable experience in direct sunlight. Details regarding refresh rate and panel type (LTPO vs standard) are missing for the Reno10 Pro, further solidifying the 13T’s display advantage.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but both phones are expected to feature multi-camera systems. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Xiaomi 13T’s marketing emphasizes its photo and video capabilities, suggesting a more robust camera experience. The Reno10 Pro’s camera system is less highlighted, implying a potentially more standard offering. It’s important to note that the presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device adds little practical value, and focus should be on the main and ultrawide sensors.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8200, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with the same core arrangement (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). However, the Xiaomi 13T utilizes the 'Ultra' variant of the chip. While the core architecture is identical, the 'Ultra' designation typically indicates higher clock speeds or optimizations within the GPU, potentially offering a slight edge in graphics-intensive tasks. Both phones likely pair the chipset with ample RAM, though specific speeds (LPDDR5x) are not provided. Thermal management will be crucial, and the 13T’s larger chassis may offer better dissipation.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T demonstrates a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101 hours. This suggests a highly optimized power management system. Conversely, the Oppo Reno10 Pro prioritizes charging speed with its 100W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 9 minutes. The 13T’s 67W charging, while still fast, takes 42 minutes for a full charge. This trade-off positions the Reno10 Pro as ideal for users who frequently need quick top-ups, while the 13T caters to those who prefer longer runtimes between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds and value a phone that can quickly top up between uses. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prioritize all-day battery life and a brighter display for outdoor visibility, even if it means a longer charging cycle. Both phones offer excellent performance for the price, but cater to different usage patterns.