Oppo Reno10 Pro vs vivo X90s: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and the fastest charging, the vivo X90s is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 120W charging is demonstrably quicker. However, the Reno10 Pro remains a strong contender for those seeking a refined experience at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | vivo X90s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, June 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, June 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 197.5 / 201.5 / 202.2 / 203.5 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+B2c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 9 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | 4810 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, White, Red, Green |
| Models | PHV110 | V2241HA |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 510 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Excellent all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Efficient Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Slower charging speed (100W vs 120W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the X90s
vivo X90s
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9200+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Enhanced image processing capabilities
- Potentially higher price
- May experience slightly faster battery drain under heavy load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels (data not provided), the core difference lies under the hood. The Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 will need to drive the display, while the X90s’ Dimensity 9200+ has more headroom. Without specific display specs, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but the X90s’ superior processing power suggests it could handle more complex display features like higher refresh rates or HDR content more efficiently. Bezels are likely comparable given both brands’ design philosophies.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the X90s’ more powerful chipset allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 is still capable, but the 9200+ provides a computational advantage. We can assume both phones will offer capable main sensors, but the X90s’ processing power could elevate its low-light performance and video recording capabilities. The presence of OIS on both is likely, but sensor size and aperture values would be crucial for a definitive assessment.
Performance
The vivo X90s holds a significant advantage in processing power thanks to its Mediatek Dimensity 9200+. The Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.35 GHz, represents a substantial architectural leap over the Reno10 Pro’s Cortex-A78 core (3.1 GHz). The X90s also benefits from newer Cortex-A715 performance cores versus the A78 in the Reno10 Pro. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher sustained frame rates in demanding games. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the architectural improvements in the 9200+ outweigh the process node similarity. The X90s will likely exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The vivo X90s’ 120W charging is a clear win, achieving 50% charge in just 8 minutes compared to the Reno10 Pro’s 9 minutes with 100W. While both offer reverse wired charging, the faster charging speed of the X90s is a significant convenience factor. Battery capacity is not specified, but the X90s’ more powerful chipset may consume slightly more power, potentially offsetting some of the charging advantage. The Reno10 Pro may offer slightly longer battery life in less demanding scenarios due to the less power-hungry Dimensity 8200.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) if you need a well-rounded smartphone with excellent battery life and a focus on everyday usability. Buy the vivo X90s if you prioritize gaming performance, demanding multitasking, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means slightly shorter battery runtimes.