vivo iQOO 11S vs Oppo Reno10 Pro: Which Android Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding peak performance and the fastest charging available, the vivo iQOO 11S is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Reno10 Pro provides a strong alternative for those prioritizing a refined user experience and a more balanced feature set, especially at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 9 min Reverse wired | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PHV110 | V2304A |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Faster 100W charging offers quick top-ups.
- Dimensity 8200 provides a good balance of performance and efficiency.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Oppo's ColorOS is known for its user-friendly interface.
- Performance lags behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.
- Charging speed is significantly slower than the iQOO 11S.
vivo iQOO 11S
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers top-tier performance.
- Blazing-fast 200W charging for minimal downtime.
- Superior GPU for demanding mobile games.
- Advanced ISP for enhanced image processing.
- Potentially higher price tag.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 can generate more heat under sustained load.
Display Comparison
While specific display specs are missing, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels. However, the iQOO 11S, typical of iQOO’s gaming focus, may prioritize peak brightness and response times. The Reno10 Pro, given Oppo’s display expertise, could focus on color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of LTPO information suggests the Reno10 Pro might have a slightly less adaptive refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life during static content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, iQOO phones often prioritize computational photography for vibrant, social media-ready images, while Oppo tends towards a more natural color profile. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the iQOO 11S offers advanced features like 8K video recording and improved low-light performance. The Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 ISP is capable, but likely lags behind in processing speed and feature set. The presence or absence of optical image stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor will be a critical differentiator, impacting image clarity and video stability.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 11S’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2GHz, offering a significant performance advantage over the Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm). The Snapdragon’s architecture – with its Cortex-A715 and A710 cores – is designed for sustained performance, while the Dimensity 8200 relies more heavily on Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to superior gaming performance and faster application loading times on the iQOO 11S. The iQOO 11S also benefits from the Snapdragon’s superior GPU, crucial for demanding mobile titles. Both utilize a 4nm process, but Qualcomm’s architecture generally provides better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11S’s 200W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in under 20 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Reno10 Pro’s 100W charging, which, while still rapid, takes considerably longer. The Reno10 Pro’s inclusion of reverse wired charging is a useful feature for topping up accessories. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO 11S’s higher charging speed suggests a potentially smaller battery to manage thermal constraints. The Dimensity 8200 in the Reno10 Pro is generally more power-efficient, potentially offsetting the iQOO 11S’s faster charging with longer battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) if you need a well-rounded smartphone with a focus on everyday usability, efficient power management, and a potentially more competitive price. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you prioritize uncompromising gaming performance, the absolute fastest charging speeds, and are willing to trade some battery life for that power.